2005 (11) TMI 440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aside the Show Cause Notices at Annexure "C" collectively, which are issued pursuant to the aforesaid Notification No.10/2004-CE (NT) dated 3.6.2004; C) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, direction or order, directing the respondents to forthwith sanction the rebate claims filed by the petitioner which are at Annexure "A" collectively and be further pleased to restrain the respondents Nos.2 and 3 from adjudicating the show cause notices at Annexure "C" collectively; D) An ex-parte ad-interim relief in terms of para (C) above may kindly be granted; E) Any other further relief as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also please be granted; 2. After the petition was admitted vide order dated 11th March, 2005 the same was taken up for hearing as regards interim relief. However, as no order was made Civil Application No.3025 of 2005 came to be moved by the petitioner. The said Civil Application was rejected vide order dated 3rd May, 2005. The petitioner thereupon approached the Apex Court and vide order dated 5th September, 2005 the matter came to be dismissed. However, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to export final products without payment of duty after executing the necessary bond in this regard and under sub-rule (2) of Rule 19 of the Rules any material which is used in the manufacturing or processing of goods i.e. final products which are exported can also be removed without payment of duty. He, therefore, urged that both under sub-rule (1) and sub-rule (2) of Rule 19 of the Rules an exporter has the option to seek exportation of final products or removal of inputs without payment of duty, but in the event an exporter exercises option only qua one or the other sub-rule and claims rebate under Rule 18 qua the final products the provisions, as they stand, permit such a course of action. But by virtue of the Amendment Notification dated 3rd June, 2005 the option available with an exporter is taken away and the exporter who opts to remove the inputs without payment of duty is forced to export the final products also without payment of duty, even though the exporter is entitled to claim rebate under Rule 18 in relation to the duty paid on such final products. He, therefore, urged that the said Amendment Notification be struck down as going beyond the provisions of Rule 19 of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in fact availed of any double deduction, the matter was at the stage of show cause notice, and in the circumstances after the petitioner tenders its reply, is heard and adjudication process is undertaken, that the facts can come on record, whether in fact the petitioner has derived double benefit or not. He, therefore, submitted that the respondent authority be permitted to proceed with the proceedings in pursuance of the show cause notices. 9. Rules 18 and 19 of the Rules read as under: Rule 18. Rebate of duty. -- Where any goods are exported, the Central Government may, by notification, grant rebate of duty paid on such excisable goods or duty paid on materials used in the manufacture or processing of such goods and the rebate shall be subject to such conditions or limitations, if any, and fulfillment of such procedure, as may be specified in the notification. Explanation. - "Export" includes goods shipped as provision or stores for use on board a ship proceeding to a foreign port or supplied to a foreign going aircraft. Rule 19. Export without payment of duty.-- (1) Any excisable goods may be exported without payment of duty from a factory of the producer or the manufactu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... duty free, or which are removed without payment of duty on execution of bond, when used for the purposes of manufacture or processing of final products which are exported, the exporter must export the goods only under Rule 19(1) of the Rules is not borne out by the provisions of the Rules. 13. In a case where the final product itself is liable to duty and the exporter, on clearance of such goods for export, makes a claim for rebate on payment of duty at the time of clearance, cannot be prevented from doing so on the specious plea that the inputs used in manufacture of such final products were procured without payment of duty. There is no rationale for such course of action apart from the fact that, as stated hereinbefore, the relevant Rules do not envisage any such requirement. The statement made on oath in the affidavit-in-reply by respondent No.2 that in such an eventuality an exporter would get double benefit is not supported by a plain reading of the provisions of the Rules. Nor has anything been brought on record to substantiate the aforesaid averment. It remains a bald averment not supported by any evidence on record. 14. There is one more reason. As can be seen from readi....