2014 (1) TMI 333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te the assessee. The plea raised by the applicant in this regard is as under : "1. That the above mentioned appeal was filed by the appellant and was fixed for hearing before this Hon'ble Bench on 05.12.2012. 2. That the Counsel was not well since suffering from fever and therefore application praying for adjournment was filed however, the Hon'ble Bench rejected the application for adjournment on the ground of repeated adjournments on three dates i.e., 07.04.2011, 25.04,2011 and 11.07.2011. 3. That it is humbly submitted that on 07.04.2011, the Counsel was appointed and filed its power of attorney while on 25.04.2011 adjournment was by the Bench as there was no time since it was involved in other cases while on 11.07.2011 the adjournment....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Fabricators Pvt. Ltd., the assessee had failed to produce any evidence/document in support during the assessment proceedings. The C IT(Appeals) had upheld the disallowance of interest u/s 36(1)(iii) of the Act, however restricted the same to the period said amounts were outstanding for. The CIT(Appeals) had further dealt with the advance made to M/s Punjab Machinery Works Pvt. Ltd. The CIT(Appeals) had allowed the relief in respect of opening balance of Rs.9,30,000/- in the said account. However, in the absence of any evidence that the advances were made for business purposes, proportionate disallowance out of interest was upheld by the CIT(Appeals) on the balance advance made to M/s Punjab Machinery Works P.Ltd. Similar addition was made....