Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 1371

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondent : R. R. Agarwal ORDER 1. We have heard Sri Dhananjai Awasthi for the appellant-department. Sri R.R. Agarwal appears for the respondent-assessee. 2. This Income Tax Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, Delhi dated 30.09.2002, relevant for the Assessment Year 1991-92, by which the T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome Tax Appeal filed by the respondent assessee against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30.09.2002, being Income-tax Appeal Defective No. 114 of 2002, was decided on 3.7.2008. 5. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal No. 3234/Del.95 on the ground that it had dealt with all the grounds taken by the assessee, and therefore, keeping in view the findings given in the asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... decided against the revenue and in favour of assessee. 8. So far as the second question is concerned, it is covered by decision in CIT Vs. M/s. Deep Awadh Hotel [Income Tax Appeal No. 81 of 2002 decided on 3.8.2011, in which this Court held as follows:- "In CIT Vs. Ranchi Club Ltd., (2001) 247 ITR 209 decided by the three judges of the Supreme Court, the SLP was dismissed on merits. The fac....