Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... limited company and had set up a new industrial unit which went into commercial production on December 12, 1994. It applied for the grant of eligibility certificate for deferment of payment of sales tax under rule 28-A of the Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975. This claim of the petitioner was rejected by the lower level screening Committee on March 14, 1997. Feeling aggrieved by this order, a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hly instalments of Rs. 1.5 lacs each beginning from June, 1998. Since the petitioner failed to comply with this direction, the appeal was dismissed. Feeling aggrieved by this order, an appeal was filed before the Sales Tax Tribunal which, too, was dismissed on December 4, 1998 on the ground that the petitioner had failed to comply with the interim order passed by the Joint Excise and Taxation Comm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....these should be heard on merits without requiring the petitioner to deposit the assessed amount. It is true that on the date when the appeals were dismissed the petitioner was not in possession of the eligibility and the entitlement certificates but those have been obtained by it subsequently and after these had been issued, the petitioner had become entitled to deferment of sales tax w.e.f. Decem....