Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (1) TMI 932

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thority under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 for the assessment period 1994-95 under section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 on 31st December, 1998. Originally challenge to the reassessment order for the assessment period 1994-95 was made by way of Original Application No. 42 of 1999 before the Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal along with demands raised for reassessment/provisional assessment....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the assessing authority on December 31, 1998. 4.. All the petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed by the learned single Judge on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. The petitioner has alleged and the fact has not been disputed that the reassessment has been made on December 31, 1998, in pursuance of notice under section 12 which was served on the same date. 5.. It is on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....availability of alternative remedy is not considered a ground for non-suiting the petitioner for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The principle is well-established in the decision of Supreme Court in A.V. Venkateswaran, Collector of Customs, Bombay v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani AIR 1961 SC 1506 and also on the ground that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g liability to the tune of Rs. 15,26,600 was afforded; that is to say the issue involved in this case has been decided without hearing the petitioner at all. 9.. In these circumstances, we are of the opinion that it ought not to have held as ground for dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petitioner is entitled to be heard before any order is passed affecting his right advers....