Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 748

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : Mr. R K Singla, Commissioner (AR) PER : P G Chacko This application filed by the appellant seeks waiver and stay in respect of the adjudged dues which include duty of Rs.2,58,28,867/- demanded from them for the period from July 2009 to September 2010. On a perusal of the records and hearing both sides, we find that the impugned demand of duty is on a product which was claimed by the assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d out that the learned Commissioner considered the absence of cocoa butter as irrelevant. It is also submitted that the adjudicating authority misunderstood the ratio of the Tribunal's decision in Nestle India Ltd. Vs. CCE [2008 (227) E.L.T. 631 (Tri. -Mum.)]. The learned counsel, referring to the said judgment, submits that what was found to be irrelevant in that case was the presence or absence ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sel submits that the facts of the case covered by the cited Stay Order are different. He submits that the above pre-deposit was ordered after taking note of the presence of cocoa butter in the product manufactured during the period from September 2004 to June 2009. Contextually, it is submitted that the appellant stopped adding cocoa butter after the above period and hence the Stay Order cited by ....