Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd income from other sources Rs. 6,38,993/- respectively. Survey operations were conducted at the business premises of the assessee on 13/09/2010. During the course of survey operations, the assessee admitted additional income of Rs. 30,00,000/- for the current assessment year and the same was offered to tax to cover up the discrepancies relating to turnover and other discrepancies. In confirmity with the admissions given during the course of survey operations, the assessee filed revised return of income on 29/11/2011 declaring revised total income of Rs. 68,42,330/-. As per the original return of income as well as revised return of income there was a claim for refund. So far the assessee did not get any refund. 3. The case of the assessee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us and has raised the following grounds of appeal: "1. The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous both on facts and in law. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the AO in rejecting the books of account. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in estimating the profit at 5% of the gross turnover of Rs. 14,19,43,629/-. The CIT(A) ought to have considered the fact that the appellant is not the owner of the transport vehicles and that the appellant is entitled only for the difference in the amounts received and amounts paid. 4. The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the commission of Rs. 4,59,145/- and the additional income offered of Rs. 30,00,000/- need to be added separately when the learned ....