Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (1) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed against a common order made by the Tribunal in relation to assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89. The petitioner is a retail dealer. He declared total and taxable turnover as:   1987-88 1988-89 Rs. 10,31,614.17 Rs. 3,27,695.29 Rs. 1,31,433 Rs. 43,415 The assessing officer rejected the declared turnovers on the basis that classified sales account had not been properly maint....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sed on any material. (4) The gross profits added at 20 per cent to general goods and dyes; 29.25 per cent to tea and 10 per cent to second dealer purchases is not correct. 3.. The Tribunal considered the question whether there were classified purchase accounts for the relevant years or any other material to accept the returns filed by the assessee. On examination of the material, the Tribuna....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r purchase expenses and the liability towards sales tax which the dealer has to bear. Thus, the 1st, 3rd and 4th contentions advanced on behalf of the petitioner stand rejected. 4.. So far as the contention advanced on behalf of the petitioner, that the decision in New Swastik Flour Mills [1992] 84 STC 49 (Kar) would be applicable to the facts of the case, would not be correct inasmuch as the S....