2000 (2) TMI 797

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st 22, 1995 passed by the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal, Ajmer, whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed the Appeal No. 20 of 1992 along with Appeals Nos. 19 and 21 of 1992. 2.. The respondent was subjected to a provisional assessment in respect of sale of aluminium foils, which were sold by it by charging sales tax at 1 per cent. The assessing officer was of the view that it was taxable at 4 pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4.. Thereafter, the assessing officer filed an appeal before the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal which also came to be rejected vide judgment dated August 22, 1995. The Tribunal held that since the assessing officer has passed a regular assessment order in respect of the entire period and, therefore, the question of determining the validity of provisional assessment has become academic. 5.. It is....