Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (12) TMI 31

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an Assistant Commissioner to be extended the benefit of upgradation is assessed by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) by undertaking an exercise, akin to the one for promotion. The DPC which met on 21.12.2011 found the petitioner eligible for being extended the benefit of third upgradation. Before an order extending the benefit of upgradation came to be passed by the appointing authority, a charge memo was issued to the petitioner on 27.12.2011 framing certain charges referable to his functioning in the year 2002 at Sadasivapet. Taking the same into account, the respondents did not extend the benefit of upgradation. The petitioner filed O.A.No.1457 of 2012 before the Hyderabad Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal feeli....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion on the matter relating to promotion or extension of the benefit. He contends that the recommendation of the DPC by itself does not confer any right. It is also his case that the fact situation in the present case is akin to the one for which sealed cover procedure can be adopted. On account of the length of service rendered by the petitioner, he became eligible to be considered for extension of the third upgradation. The appointing authority has also forwarded the case of the petitioner to the DPC and the latter in turn found him to be eligible. The subsequent issuance of charge sheet against the petitioner was treated as the basis to deny him the benefit of upgradation. The case on hand presents a typical situation, which one rar....