Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (4) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by M.S. LIBERHAN, C.J.-The brief undisputed facts are that an amount of Rs. 10,43,511 for the assessment year 1993-94 was due from the department to the petitioner-company, which has been refunded in instalments and finally a balance of Rs. 4,30,000 is to be paid which has been withheld. 2.. The only stand taken by the respondent to withhold the refund is, that another company is in arrears....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of the petitioner's company is the director of the third company will not make the petitioner-company liable for payment of the amount due towards arrears of tax of the third company. 5.. Thus, in the totality of circumstances, the ground on which the money was withheld cannot be sustained. The respondent-authorities are directed to refund the amount due to the petitioner with interest within....