2013 (11) TMI 1357

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....output service. Out of such cenvat credit taken, During the period 01-04-2006 to 01-04-2008 most of the credits related to services which were specified in rule 6 (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which allowed 100% of the credit of tax paid on services specified in the sub-rule irrespective of the fact whether the services were utilized partially in exempted services and partially in taxable services. After taking such credit, they were complying with the provisions of extant rule 6(3) of CCR 04 by restricting the utilization of Cenvat credit to the extent of 20% of service tax payable during each period. They were filing the cenvat returns accordingly. The applicant had certain amount of credit lying in their credit as on 31-03-2008. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e impugned order Rs. 5,84,69,919/- can be split up as under: S. No. Ground for denial of credit Amount (Rs.) 1.   Input services which were used exclusively for trading activity 18,98,473   2.   Input services which were used commonly for trading activity and taxable service and hence proportionate credit attributable to trading activity is liable to be recovered 5,40,93,621   3.   Credit taken before making payment to input service provider 24,77,825   Total   5,84,69,919   Aggrieved by the order, the applicant has filed an appeal along with stay petition. 5. Arguing for the applicants, the learned counsel submits that they are not contesting the amount of Rs.18,98,473/- which....