Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (10) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of balance amount of duty and entire amount of penalty imposed upon M/s. Santogen Silk Mills and penalties imposed on other appellants who are the employees of M/s. Santogen Silk Mills and proceed further to decide the appeals itself, inasmuch as we find that the Commissioner, while passing the impugned order, has not carried out the directions as contained in the earlier remand order of the Tribunal. 2. After hearing both sides, we find that the Tribunal vide its order No. C-III-834 to 841/2003-WZB, dated 19-5-2003 [2003 (157) E.L.T. 208 (T)] after considering the learned Jt. CDR's submission that though an opportunity to inspect the seized documents was given to the appellant, the copie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Commissioner, Central Excise (Preventive), Central Excise & Customs, Vapi w.r.t. his letter No. IV/9-HPIU- III/86-96, dated 1-4-99. He is requested to arrange the copies of the required documents well in advance of the date of P.H. i.e. 8-12-03." Copy of M/s. Santogen Silk Mills Ltd.'s letter dt. 8-12-03 addressed to Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise (Preventive), Vapi. "Dear Sir, Sub : CEGAT's Order Nos. C-III/834-841/2003-WZB, dated 19-5-2003 in case of M/s. Santogen Silk Mills Ltd. We are enclosing herewith copy of Letter F.No. V(Ch.54)/15- 2/OA/99, dated 6-11-2003. In this connection, we request you to provide us documents at Sr. Nos. 7 to 16 of Annexure to show cause notice to enable us to submit our advocate for r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dated 29-8-08 regarding the above and communicating the date of personal hearing fixed on 16-9-08. By the said letter, we have also been directed to approach Dy. Commissioner HQ, (Preventive), Vapi, for copies of relied upon documents so far not given to us. Accordingly, we have already addressed a separate letter dated 11-9-08 to Dy. Commissioner, HQ (Preventive) with a request to forward us copies of relied upon documents (Sr. Nos. 7 to 16 of Annexure of show cause notice). On receipt of the above documents, we shall hand over the same to our Advocate, who is handling the above matter. We will at least require 60 days time thereafter to finalise the reply letter. Accordingly, we request your honour to adjourn the PH and same may....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 26-A, Chandivali, Saki Vihar Road, Andheri (East), Mumbai 400 072. Thanking you, Yours faithfully. For Santogen Silk Mills Ltd. Sd/- Authorised Signatory." 4. Commissioner, in his impugned order, has observed as under : "On 15-12-03, AC(P), Vapi has informed that the noticees have not contacted his office for obtaining the copies of the relied upon documents. It is interesting to note that the noticees made an issue of the fact that the documents were not supplied to them in spite of their request before the Tribunal during the hearing on 1-5-03, but though they received the letter advising them to contact AC(P), Vapi for collecting the documents on 17-11-03, they did not turn up till 15-12-03. This only pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 different dates viz. 8-12-03, 10-12-03, 12-12-03, 26-8-08, 28-8-08, 16-9-08, 24-7-09, 29-7-09 and 12-8-09, 3-9-09 were fixed, but they did not appear. I have already recorded at Para 7.3 above that before that before the first OIO was passed on 15-5-02, 16 dates were offered to them. It proves that this is the modus operandi of the noticees, deliberately not to receive the intimation and not to appear before the original adjudicating authority but then to create a big noise about non-adherence of principle of natural justice." 5. As is seen from the above reproduction of part of the impugned order, the report given by the Assistant Commissioner (Vapi) was factually incorrect inasmuch as the appellant had approached the said Assist....