Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (11) TMI 129

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Assessing Officer on account of advertisement expenses.   2. Whether the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was correct on facts and circumstances of the case and in law in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 1,57,665 made by the Assessing Officer on account of depreciation on printers and scanner. 3. The appellant craves leave, to add, alter or amend any ground of appeal raised above at the time of hearing." Apropos deletion of Rs. 8,76,435 In this case it was observed by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has claimed an amount of Rs. 10,95,543 being advertisement and marketing expenses as revenue expenditure. The Assessing Officer opined that the assessee has incurred this huge expenditure for launching its bra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd perused the records. We find that the case law relied upon by the Assessing Officer in the case of Madras Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd. v. CIT [1997] 225 ITR 802 (SC) is not applicable on the facts of the present case. In the aforesaid case the said Corporation issued debentures in December, 1966 at a discount. The total discount on the issue of Rs. 1.5 crores amounted to Rs. 3,00,000 for the assessment year 1968-69. The company wrote off Rs. 12,500 out of the total discount of Rs. 3,00,000 being the proportionate amount of discount for the period of six months ending June 30, 1967 taking into account the period of 12 years which was a period of redemption and discount for Rs. 3,00,000 over the period of 12 years. In these circu....