Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 1187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ck period from 01.04.1989 to 08.07.1999. On 30.03.2005, a Coordinate bench of this Court has admitted the instant appeal on the following substantial questions of law: 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in brushing aside the statement of Sri Surendra Nath Rastogi, partner of the firm recoded at the time of search under section 132 (4) of the I. T. Act, 1961 admitting the total undisclosed income of the firm at Rs.40,00,000/- without appreciating that the statement recorded under section 132 (4) of the I. T. Act, 1961 stands on a different footing and a great evidentiary value has been attached to such a statement, under the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. Whether on the facts and in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her made the addition of Rs.22.00 lacs on account of undisclosed investment required for effecting a turnover of Rs.1.0 crores outside the book. Thus, the total addition on the two counts was made by the Assessing Officer for Rs.42,00,000/-. In first appeal, the CIT(A) has estimated the GP rate @20% and also accepted the investment disclosed by the assessee for the turnover and gave a partial relief of Rs.40.00 lacs to the assessee vide order dated 04.07.2003. Not being satisfied, the department has filed the second appeal before the Tribunal (608/luc/2003) and the assessee has also field cross objection (47/luc/2004) for the block period. The Tribunal vide its impugned order has dismissed the appeal filed by the department and the cross....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ther hand, Sri Mudit Agarwal, learned counsel for the assessee has justified the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. After hearing both the parties and on perusal of record, it appears that the A.O. has estimated the GP Rate @20% on the estimated turnover of Rs.1.0 crore. The A.O. also made the addition in respect of the undisclosed investment. He applied the rate of 1/5 of Rs.1.0 crore on the basis of rotation of the investment as taking place in five time rotation period and worked out the amount of Rs.20/- lacs as undisclosed investment on transactions of Rs.1.0 crore. Total addition on these two counts made by the A.O. for Rs.42.00 lakh. The CIT (A) has estimated the G.P. Rate @ 20% and deleted the addition of Rs.20.00 lacs, wh....