Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (11) TMI 403

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the petition), purportedly given under section 4-B(6) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act (briefly, "the Act") for the assessment year 1975-76. Undisputed facts are that the petitioner was granted a recognition certificate (annexure "1" to the writ petition) to purchase raw material, i.e., oil seed for the manufacture of oil at a concessional rate. An assessment order relating to the assessment year 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lated the provisions of section 4-B(6) of the Act. Sub-section (6) of section 4-B which has been omitted with effect from May 14, 1994 at the relevant time, in so far as material, was that where a dealer, in whose favour a recognition certificate has been granted under sub-section (2), purchases any goods for use in the manufacture or packing of any notified goods without payment of tax or by payi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5 and therefore, that is not covered by the expression "notified goods". These facts are not disputed by the Standing Counsel. We are, therefore, of the view that sub-section (6) of section 4-B cannot be said to have been violated, inasmuch as the notified goods have not been sold by the petitioner outside the State in view of sub-section (6) of section 4-B. Simply because the petitioner effected ....