2013 (10) TMI 1149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Appellant: Shri P.R. Mullick, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri Gobind Dixit & Shri R.K. Verma, A.R. ORDER Per D.N. Panda: We have heard this matter for a long time expressing our anxiety whether the matter shall be jurisdiction of Anti-dumping Bench as export was made from China and the goods covered by Notification No. 39/2010-Cus dated 23.3.2010 as indicated in the table ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssification done by Revenue to bring the goods to the fold of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was proper. Accordingly, there was levy of Rs. 1,48,42,522/- towards Anti-dumping duty followed by equal amount of penalty and other consequences like penalty and interest. 3. Revenue supports the adjudication on the ground that when the goods imported was properly classifiable under Tariff Entry No. 8477 whi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Bench when appeal reaches for hearing. 5. In view of the aforesaid scenario, to work out interim modality and also to strike a balance of case of both sides, we direct the appellant M/s. Texplas (India) Pvt. Ltd. in Customs stay application No. 2047/2011 (in Customs appeal No. 310/2011), to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs (Rupees forty lakhs) within 8 weeks from today and make compliance on 29th July, 2....