Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 1022

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tribunal was justified in holding that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act cannot be levied in a case where the assessed income is a loss ?" At the outset it is necessary to briefly mention the facts leading to the reference. The assessee-firm is a civil contractor. They filed the return of income for the assessment year 1990-91 showing loss of Rs. 28,27,249. The Incometax Officer completed the assessment under section 144 of the Act. While doing so, he added Rs. 19,15,002 and reduced the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 to Rs. 7,45,253, and determined the tax payable at Rs. 9,03,375. Penalty proceedings were also initiated separately under section 271(1)(c) of the Act and an amount of Rs. 14,34,294 was imposed as penalty by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....curate particulars of such income, in addition to tax payable by him, a sum which shall not be less than and which shall not be more than three times "the amount of tax sought to be evaded" by reason of such concealment shall be levied and collected as penalty. Even if a loss return is filed, if the amount of concealment has the effect of reducing the loss in the return or converting such loss into income, section 271(1)(c) of the Act is attracted. It is well settled that a taxing statute has to be strictly interpreted by giving a plain meaning to the clear and unambiguous language used by the Legislature. The script of law cannot be read in such a manner which has the effect of changing the spirit of law. When Explanation 4(a) clearly spea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dge Bench. The Revenue submitted that the purpose behind section 271(1)(c) of the Act was to penalise the assessee for concealing the particulars and furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, whether the income returned is a profit or loss are really of no consequence and that Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c) was clarificatory in nature and would apply to all assessments even prior to the assessment year 2003-04. On consideration of the recommendations of the Wanchoo Committee pursuant to which Explanation 4(a) was inserted, the Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No. 204, dated July 24, 1976, the Finance Act, 1979, the relevant clauses of the Finance Act, 2002, and the case law dealing with interpretation of statutes being prosp....