Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (4) TMI 454

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ely, Faridabad Gas Gadgets Limited on payment of tax at 4 per cent. 3. As far as the present proceedings under section 41(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, is concerned it is limited to two items, because the Assistant Commissioner (Assessment) by the order dated July 28, 1989 in regard to the above two items made the following observations on scrutiny of accounts in the following manner: "1. The commission of Rs. 55,000 has been paid to one Srinivasan, i.e., Rs. 25,000 on April 3, 1987 and Rs. 30,000 on July 17, 1987 as per vouchers 7 and 98. The vouchers have not been produced for verification. The nature of commission paid is not ascertainable. The corresponding sale has not been accounted. The sale on this account is p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ccepted as a mistake.   5.. Even the first appellate authority-Additional Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax (Appeals) in the order dated August 28, 1990, has considered these aspects independently. It has also taken into consideration that if Sri Srinivasan is the son-in-law of one of the partners there has to be some material if the payment is considered as commission and not ex gratia payment. In fact the appellate authority has referred to the receipts issued by Srinivasan and Udayakumar showing that the amount received by them was towards commission account. The first appellate authority found the contents of the receipt in contradistinction with the plea of it being ex gratia payment. The first appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....escribed as commission. In the context of the business activity under consideration in these proceedings the word commission cannot be understood otherwise in any manner and never to mean ex gratia payment as sought to be contended. In such a situation where factually all that occurs is immediate, inevitable and necessary inference of the term commission in relation to the sales in the context. It is impossible to consider the use of the word commission as synonimous in any manner with ex gratia payment as is sought to be contended. In fact the use of the word independently in the documentary evidence and that too emanating from close relations such as Srinivasan, the son-in-law of the Managing Partner Mr. Nagarajan and Mr. Udayakumar who i....