Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 679

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent: Shri Devinder Singh, Jt. CDR ORDER Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): The prayer in the stay petition is to dispense with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs.78,53,643/- and penalty of identical amount imposed upon the applicant appellant who are engaged in the manufacture of LCD Televisions. 2. For the above purpose, the appellant imported LCD panels. It is seen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the applicant. 4. It so happened that some LCD panels imported by the appellant could not be put to use and the same are exported to the supplier. The dispute arises in respect of the said re-exported panels. Revenue, by entertaining a view that inasmuch as the applicant has not used the imported goods in the manufacture of their final product, the concessional customs duty paid by the applicant....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein it stands held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the expression 'for use appearing in notification No. 13/97-Cus, is required to be read as 'intended for use'. Inasmuch as in the present case the appellants have imported LCD panels with an intention to use the same in the manufacture of their final product and inasmuch as they have not been able to use the same, it ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....troduced in the said Rules allowing re-export of the unutilized imported goods. 8. In any case and in any view of the matter we also note that the appellant at the time of import of the goods claimed the classification under heading 9013 which attract nil rate of duty. The said classification was not allowed to be adopted and the same was changed to8529. Now the Tribunal in the case of Videocon I....