2013 (10) TMI 498

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent : Pradeep S. Jetly with Annie Fernandes JUDGEMENT:- Rule, returnable forthwith. At the request of the counsel for both sides, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. By this petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the order dated 6 November 2012 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench (CESTAT) rejecting pet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the petitioner also contends that there are decisions of Karnataka High Court and Punjab and Haryana High Court in their favour covering the issue arising in the appeal before the CESTAT. 4. The impugned order by CESTAT rejected the application of the petitioner for early hearing of their appeal only on the ground that the amount in dispute is less than Rs.1 crore. 5. We find that the issue ....