Tax Case: Misclassification of Benefits as Perquisites Instead of Deemed Dividends u/ss 2(22)(a) and 2(24)(iv.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(a) - perquisite u/s 2(24)(iv) - CIT(A) is not justified to hold that it is perquisite benefit given by HPPL to its shareholder and not the transfer of occupancy rights to its shareholders. - AO has rightly held that the value of flats received are nothing but dividend given in the form of assets by HPPL. - AT....