Regarding anti dumping duty on Sodium Hydrosulphite originating in or exported from, People's Republic of China
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Schedule lo the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), originating in, or exported from the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the subject country), the designated authority in its preliminary findings vide notification No. 39/1/2000-DGAD dated the 2nd January, 2001, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 2nd January, 2001 had come to the conclusion that - (a) Sodium Hydrosulphite originating in, or exported from, the People's Republic of China, had been exported to India below its normal value, resulting in dumping; (b) the Indian industry had suffered material injury; (c) the injury had been caused cumulatively by the imports from the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gnated authority could not explore the same as the exporter shown its unwillingness subsequently; and had recommended the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the subject goods originating in or exported from the subject country; And whereas, on the basis of the aforesaid final findings of the designated authority, the Central Government had imposed final anti-dumping duty on the subject goods vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 114/2001-CUSTOMS, dated the 2nd November, 2001 published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide G.S.R. No. 820(E), dated the 2nd November, 2001; And whereas, the designated ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gs in Sunset review vide notification No. 15/16/2005-DGAD, dated the 6th September, 2006, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 7th September, 2006, had come to the conclusion that- (a) the subject goods had been exported to India from the subject country below its normal value resulting into dumping and there was likelihood of continued dumping of the subject goods, if anti- dumping from subject country Is withdrawn; (b) the domestic industry continued to suffer material injury on account of the dumped imports of the subject goods from the subject country; and (c) the authority considered it appropriate that anti-dumping duties was required to be imposed a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted the 16th October, 2006 published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide G.S.R. No. 641(E), dated the 16th October, 2006; And whereas the designated authority, in its final findings in mid-term review, vide notification No. 15/21/2008-DGAD, dated the 31st August, 2009, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, section 1, dated the 31st August, 2009, has come to the conclusion that- (i) The subject goods are entering the Indian market at dumped prices and dumping margins of the subject goods imported from the subject country is substantial and above de-minimis. (ii) The Authority notes that during the sunset review, the duty was recommended in the form of reference pric....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ct country continue to cause a substantial injury to the domestic industry. Should the present anti dumping duties be revoked, injury to the domestic industry is likely to continue and intensify. and has recommended continued imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty on modified rates on imports of the subject goods originating in, or exported from, the subject country; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act read with rules 18 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 and in supersession of the notification of the Government of India in....
TaxTMI