CS (OS) No. 2982/2011 in the matter of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner) vs. Bharat Bhogilal Patel, Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai / Delhi before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi – Regarding.
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. Sir, Subject: CS (OS) No. 2982/2011 in the matter of L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. (petitioner) vs. Bharat Bhogilal Patel, Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai / Delhi before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi - Regarding. Shri Bharat Bhogilal Patel has Unique Permanent Registration Number (UPRN) A0241 INBOM4PR and A0242INBOM4PR with Commissioner of Customs (Import), Air Cargo Complex for the following two patents in terms of Rule 4 of the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007: (a)....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... India, the custom department cannot take action contrary to clause 4 of the notification." 3.1. The Court further stated that mere reading of clause 4 makes it clear that as far as three violations, i.e., Patents, Design and Geographical Indications, are concerned, the defendants 2 and 3 are merely implementing agencies to enforce the orders, if passed by the Court in favour of the party pertaining to above mentioned three subjects and the custom department would be entitled to enforce the same. 3.2 The Court ruled that as far as the present case is concerned, prima facie it appears that the defendants 2 and 3 (Customs Mumbai & Delhi) cannot restrict cleara....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tification, the terms and expressions used in various clauses of the notification shall have the meanings assigned to them in the respective Acts, including the Patents Act, 1970. 4.2 Thus, the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 clearly empower the Central Government to prohibit import of goods to protect infringement of patents. Accordingly, the Central Government had issued notification 51/2010 Customs (NT) to prohibit import of goods, inter-alia, infringing specified provisions of Patent Act, 1970. The conditions and procedure based on which the prohibition would operate is listed in the IPR Rules. 4.3 The above legal position, which is unambiguous....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd the Customs is called upon or required to merely implement such order. In other words, extreme caution needs to be exercised at the time of determination of infringement of these three intellectual property rights".[underlined/in bold for emphasis] 4.5 As is evident from the above wording of the Circular No. 41/2007-Customs dated 29th October, 2007, that the Circular merely seeks to drive a note of caution with regard to the determination of infringement in case of patents, designs and Geographical Indications and does not in any manner, take away the powers of Customs authorities to act on imported goods infringing Patents Act, conferred by Section 11 of Customs Act, 1962 and Notificati....
TaxTMI