Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

When directors can be treated as 'officer who is in default' under section 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h January, 1994 of the Rajasthan High Court in the matter of Pratap Rajasthan Copper Foils & Laminates Ltd., for information (see Annex). 2. The issue relating to correct interpretation of 'officer who is in default', as per provision of section 5 of the Companies Act, 1956, has been considered by the Department in the light of the abovesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court. The Depar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ecial Court of Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences), Rajasthan, Jaipur, for the offence under section 220 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Companies Act'). At the relevant time, all the four petitioners are said to be the directors of Pratap Rajasthan Copper Foils & Laminates Ltd. incorporated under the Companies Act. Mr. P.C. Maheshwari was the managing director of the said company.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for non-compliance of the requirements of sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 220, the company and every officer of the company, who is in default, is liable to the punishment. Section 5 of the Companies Act defines 'officer who is in default' and ft provides as under : '5. Meaning of "officer who is in default" - For the purpose of any provision in this Act which enacts that a officer of the co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s who may be specified by the Board in this behalf or where no director is so specified, all the directors: Provided that where the Board exercises any powers under clause (f) or clause (g), it shall, within thirty days of the exercise of such powers, file with the Registrar a return in the prescribed form." The above definition of the 'officer who is in default' makes it clear that a director o....