Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Cases have come to the notice of the Board where the IAC passed penalty orders without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee, with the result that orders were challenged and struck down in appeal.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....61 Cases have come to the notice of the Board where the IAC passed penalty orders without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee, with the result that orders were challenged and struck down in appeal. 2. In one cases, the notice fixing the date of hearing on 18-1-1972 was served on the assessee on 19-1-1972. The fact of service on 19-1-1972 came to the IAC's notice only o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e would try and contact the assessee. However, the authorised representative did not report verbally or otherwise to the I.A.C. While levying the penalty on 27-3-1972 the I.A.C. was of the view that the minimum penalty leviable was equivalent to the income concealed and he took the addition sustained by the A.A.C. as the income concealed by the assessee. 4. The I.T.A.T., while deciding the appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellate Asst. Commissioner has thrown away the case by what we may describe as his negligence to comply with an express requirement of law." The above cases have been adversely commented on by the Audit. No remedial action is possible. 5. Attention is incited to the Board's Circular No. 25-D(XLV-15) of 1963 dated 1-10-63 under which the maintenance of a Register of Penalties was prescribed....