Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Central Excise - Valuation - Includibility of cost of secondary packing - Supreme Court's decision in the case of Collector of Central Excise v. M/s. Pond's India Ltd., Reg

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Central Excise v. M/s. Pond's India Ltd., Reg Circular No. 17/89-CX.1 Dated 10-11-1989 [From F. No. 6/34/89-CX.1] Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Excise & Customs, New Delhi Subject : Central Excise - Valuation - Includibility of cost of secondary packing - Supreme Court's decision in the case of Collector of Central Excise v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....primary or secondary, which are required to make the articles marketable would be includible in the value. How much packing is necessary to make the goods marketable is a question of fact to be determined by application of the correct approach. Packing, which is primarily done or mainly done for protecting the goods, and not for making the goods marketable should not be included. In the instant ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection by the Tribunal on this aspect of the matter. If the above be the true test, then the judgment and the order of the Tribunal must be set aside and the appeal must be allowed and the matter remanded back to the tribunal to determine afresh this question from the stand point indicated above." (Para 11). 2. From the above it is obvious that the Supreme Court has laid down the ratio to be ap....