Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Order of Authority for Advance Rulings (Customs & Central Excise) in respect of Application No.AAR/44/101/2003 dated 23.2.2004 filed by M/s.Shonkh Technologies International Ltd., NIRMAL

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espect of Application No.AAR/44/101/2003 dated 23.2.2004 filed by M/s.Shonkh Technologies International Ltd., NIRMAL Authority for Advance Rulings (Customs & Central Excise) rejected the application filed by M/s.Shonkh Technologies International Ltd., NIRMAL seeking advance ruling as to whether the process proposed to be undertaken by the applicant company amounts to manufacture under Section 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le for payment of excise duty or not. 3. The application was rejected at the stage of preliminary hearing consequent to an objection raised by the Department that the application is not maintainable since the question on which the Advance Ruling is sought does not fall under Section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Advance Ruling Authority agreed with the contention of the Department an....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....duty of excise leviable under this Act; (e) admissibility of credit of excise duty paid or deemed to have been paid on the goods used in or in relation to the manufacture of the excisable goods. 4. It was the view of the Authority for Advance Rulings that the determination of the proposed question could not be relatable to any one of the enumerated heads. Accordingly, the petition was reject....