2013 (10) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., R. K. Upadhyay ORDER The present appeal has been filed under section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order dated 18.01.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad. The appeal has been preferred by the assessee, which has been admitted by this Court on the following three questions of law. "(i) Whether on the facts and in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome was shown at Rs. 1,72,000/- The return was processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, proceedings under section 147 read with section 148 of the Act was initiated and vide order dated 29.03.2006, the assessment was completed on an income of Rs. 21,78,960/- Feeling aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who vide order dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax (Appeals) and restored the matter back to him for deciding the appeal strictly on merits. It appears that some cross-objection was also filed by the assessee which for statiscal purposes has also been allowed. Thereafter, a Misc. Application under section 254 was filed by the appellant before the Tribunal, which has also been dismissed with certain clarifications. The clarification given by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... R.K. Upadhyay, learned senior standing counsel appearing for the Revenue. Sri Upadhyay, has submitted that notice under section 143(2) of the Act was issued on 12.05.2005 and was also served upon the assessee, which fact is being seriously disputed by the appellant's counsel Sri Krishna Agrawal. The notice is not before us. The Tribunal has held service of notice under section 143(2) to be dir....