Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, for the Respondent. ORDER The present appeal has been filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the order dated 1st July, 2004 [2004 (177) E.L.T. 665 (Tri.-Del.)] passed by Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. 2. The Appeal has been admitted on the following question of law :- "(i) Whether the Hon'ble Tribu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atement from time to time before the competent authority. However, it was issued a show cause notice proposing demand of duty on the ground that during April, 1998 to March, 1999 it was required to pay duty amounting to Rs. 22.70 lacs whereas it had paid only Rs. 9,24,611/- and, accordingly, it was asked to pay differential duty. The Additional Commissioner vide order dated 7-5-2002 had confirmed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned order, it was held that the appellant is liable to discharge the duty liability. Penalty is also imposable on the appellant as he had not discharged the duty liability cast upon him. Penalty was reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs. 6. Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent. 7. As this Court had held in Central Excise Appeal Defecti....