Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 109

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....asthi, G. Krishna, R. K. Upadhaya, S Chopra For the Respondent : A. Bansal, S. K. Garg ORDER 1. We have heard Sri R.K. Upadhyay for the appellant-department. Sri Ashish Bansal appears for the respondent-assessee. 2. This Income Tax Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act 1961, arises out of an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad in Income Tax Appeal No.1574 (A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ovisions of Section 158 BC of the Act in the face of clear authorization issued by the Director of Income Tax (Investigation) Kanpur dated 3.11.1996? (ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned ITAT have erred in law in quashing and setting aside the AO's order? (iii) Whether the learned ITAT was justified in holding that the assessee's case fell under Section 158 BA (3)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, as issued against the assessee firm, as follows:- "In order to verify in whose name search was issued, we have called for the search warrant, which was produced by the ld. D.R. and we have perused the same and came to know that there was no authorisation in the case of the assessee-firm. However, it was mentioned that the authorisation was issued under Section 132 in the name of Shri Ashok Kum....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ded by the Tribunal that the search was not issued in the name of the assessee firm, the department could have filed a review application, to correct the finding of fact. 7. The Tribunal considered the argument that the AO has power to proceed under Section 158 BD and held that the learned D.R. has tried to make out an altogether new case for the department at the appellate stage for application ....