Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 91

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent: Shri K.P.Muralidharan, Superintendent (AR) JUDGEMENT 1. The applicant is engaged in activities of erection, commissioning and maintenance and repair and they are also importing certain goods and selling it locally and abroad. The Excise officers conducted a check of their books of account and found that there was certain receipts accounted as commission for which service tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,125/- was confirmed along with interest and penalty equal to the same amount. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the adjudication order. Revenue is not contesting dropped portion of the demand and appellant is not contesting the confirmed portion of the demand. The dispute is about penalty imposed. Since the matter is in a narrow compass, I consider it proper to waive the predeposit of dues and co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bmits that this issue came to light only due to investigation conducted by the department and therefore this is a case of suppression of information and he relies on section 73 (4) to argue that provisions of section 73 (3) will not apply in this case. He invites my attention to the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in para 9 of the order as to why he did not exercise the provisions of sectio....