2013 (9) TMI 780
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Respondent : Mr. S. B. Saraf, Advocate, Mr. T. M. Siddiqui,Advocate ORDER The Court : The Director of Revenue Intelligence intercepted the goods imported by the petitioner upon declaring the same to be worn clothes and the value thereof. A show cause notice was issued as the importer ought to have declared the detail break up of the various articles of the consignment in the import doc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....CIF per kg upon imposition of fine and the penalty. In terms of the order of the Tribunal the authorities took a plea that there is no indication in the order of the Tribunal for release of the goods after making payments. The petitioner thereafter made an application for modification of an order of the Tribunal as there has been an omission to indicate the quantum of redemption fine and penalt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....., dated 26th July, 2010 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Excise and Customs, New Delhi, concerning the import of the worn clothing which suggests that the import of the worn clothing should not be adjudicated and fine in lieu of confiscation and penalty imposed keeping in view the 'margin of profit' on such unauthorized import should ....
TaxTMI