Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (9) TMI 739

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent : Mr. Y. R. Mishra JUDGMENT PC:- This appeal under Section 35G of the the Central Excise Act 1944( "the Act") challenges the order dated 29 April 2013 of Central Excise Customs Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("Tribunal") requiring the appellant to predeposit 25% of the service tax demand of Rs.1.61 crores for the period June 2006 to March 2007 as confirmed by order dated 29 O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to remain with the appellant during the term of the lease. 3) The appellant had during the course of setting up the plants had engaged the services of various input service providers and the tax paid to them was taken as credit by the appellant. The credit so taken was utilized by the appellant for discharging the service tax payable while providing of maintenance and repair service. The case of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f services received during the installation and commissioning of the plant for discharge of service tax payable on providing services of maintenance and repairs as they are covered by two different agreements. The impugned order directs the appellant to predeposit 25% of Rs.1.61 crores on the basis that there are two different agreements and therefore, credit taken under one agreement cannot be ut....