TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (9) TMI 607
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onsideration not received by the appellant is erroneous in law. Handing over of possession of property was conditional in order to enable the builder to obtain necessary permission from the Govt. Agencies. There is no transfer of property as envisaged u/s 2 (47) (vi) of the Income-tax Act 1961. 3. That the learned CIT(A) has fallen in error in including the cost of flats on estimation basis which could not be ascertained as no construction or other activity has been commenced by the Developer and hence no capital gains could be levied on the cost of flats on the date of the agreement i.e. 27-04-2007. That, the Assessing Officer has fallen in error and has misconstrued the terms of the agreement dated 27-04-2007. 4. That the learned CIT(A) has also not allowed deduction u/s 54 F which was eligible to the applicant since, he has included the cost of proposed flat in the sale consideration. " 4. The Ld. DR for the revenue submitted that since the issue involved is same as in the case of lead case of Charanjit Singh Atwal (supra) and therefore same arguments may be adopted in this case. 5. Ground No. 1 - After considering the submis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s within the realm of the subjective satisfaction of the Assessing Officer. In view of this judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court and by respectfully following the same, the action of the Assessing Officer of reopening the assessment is upheld. Ground of appeal No. 1 is dismissed." Since original return was processed u/s 143(1) and the Revenue got information later on that Defence Services Co-op House Building Society Ltd. has transferred the land to developers to Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. and Hash Builders Pvt. Ltd. therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) has correctly adjudicated the issue in view of the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Broker (P.) Ltd.291 ITR 500 . 6. Grounds No. 2 & 3 - We have considered the submissions of the ld. DR for the revenue and carefully gone through the material available on record. The main issue is whether assessee is liable to capital gain tax in the year under consideration i.e assessment year 2007-08 in view of the Joint Development Agreement. The assessee is a member of Defence Services Co-op House Building Society Ltd. The Society has transferred 27.3 acres of land to the Developer i.e. M/s Tata Housi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by deducting from the full value of the consideration received or accruing as a result of the transfer of the capital asset the following amounts, namely :- (i) expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer; (ii) the cost of acquisition of the asset and the cost of any improvement thereto: 30 Again plain reading would show that capital gain would be computed by considering the full value of consideration whether received or accruing as a result of the transfer . Therefore, it is not only the consideration received which is relevant but the consideration which has accrued is also relevant. 31. The expression 'transfer' has been defined u/s 2(47) of the Act which reads as under:- 2(47) "transfer", in relation to a capital asset, includes,- (i) the sale , exchange or relinquishment of the asset ; or  ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e building and are a common mode of acquiring flats particularly in multi-storeyed constructions in big cites. The definition also does not cover cases where possession is allowed to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract, of the nature referred to in section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. New sub-clauses (v) & (vi) have been inserted in section2(47) to prevent avoidance of capital gains liability by recourse to transfer of rights in the manner referred to above. 11.2 The newly inserted sub-clause (vi) of section 2(47) has brought in to the ambit of transfer", the practice of enjoyment of property rights through what is commonly known as Power of Attorney arrangements. The practice in such cases is adopted normally where transfer of ownership is legally not permitted. A person holding the power of attorney is authorized the powers of owner, including that of making construction. The legal ownership in such cases continues to be with the transferor." 32. Before insertion of the clause (v) & (vi) to section 2( 47) of the Act, the position of law was that unless and until a sale deed was executed for transfer ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e property in Greater Bombay which consisted of various lands and buildings. By Agreement dated August 18, 1994, the assessee agreed to sell to Floreat Investment Ltd. (herein referred to 'Floreat') his share of immovable property for a total consideration of Rs. 1,85,63,220/- with right to said Floreat to develop the property in accordance with the rules/regulations framed by local authorities. For this purpose, the assessee also agreed to execute a limited power of attorney authorizing Floreat to deal with the property and also obtain permissions and approvals from various authorities. Under clause 11 of the agreement, it was provided that after Floreat was given an irrevocable license to enter upon the assessee's share of property and after Floret investment have obtained all necessary approvals, the Floret was entitled to demolish various buildings for settling the claims of the tenants. Under clause 14 of the agreement, the assessee was entitled to receive proportionate rent till the payment of last instalments and till that time assessee was bound to pay all outgoings. Under clause 20 of the Agreement, it was agreed that sale shall be completed by execution of conveyance, how....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....was introduced in the Act from the assessment year 1988-89 because prior thereto, in most cases, it was argued on behalf of the assessee that no transfer took place till execution of the conveyance. Assessees used to enter into agreements for developing properties with builders and under the arrangement with the builders, they used to confer privileges of owners hip without executing conveyance and to plug that loophole, section 2(47)(v) came to be introduced in the Act. --------------------- Held, that section 2( 47) (v) read with section 45 indicates that capital gains was taxable in the year in which such trans actions were enter ed into even if the transfer of immovable property is not effective or complete under the general law. In this case, the test had not been applied by the Department. No reason had been given why that test had not been applied, particularly when the agreement in question, read as a whole, showed that it was a development agreement. Once under clause 8 of the agreement a limited power of attorney was intended to be given to the developer to deal with the property, then the da....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... any transaction covered by clause (v) and (vi) to section 2 ( 47) the liability for capital gain would arise on the date when such transactions are entered into. In the judgment at some other places, the similar observations have been made. However, despite this observation the case was decided in favour of the assessee. The reason for the same have been given in the judgment itself. Firstly it is observed that provision of section 2(47)(v) of the Act were not invoked by the Revenue itself. This becomes clear from the following para: "It was argued on behalf of the assessee that there was no effective transfer till grant of irrevocable licence. In this connection, the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court were cited on behalf of the assessee, but all those judgment were prior to introduction of the concept of deemed transfer u/s 2(47)(v). In this matter, the agreement in question is a development agreement. Such development agreements do not constitute transfer in general law. They are spread over a period of time. They contemplate various stages. The Bombay High Court in various judgments has taken the view in several matters that the object of entering ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ril 1, 1997, from the end of the financial year ending on March 31, 1996, the builder was using the well water against payment of relevant charges to the assessee." 37. Thus it is very clear that in cases where an arrangement had been entered into by an assessee in terms of clause (v) of Section 2(47) which has effect of handing over the possession then the transfer is said to have been taken place on the date of entering into such arrangement. 38. We do not find any force in the contention of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that judgment has to be read in the context of the decision made in such judgment. In fact, it is well settled that doctrine of precedent which means what needs to be followed later on particularly by subordinate Tribunals and Courts is the ratio of a particular judgment given by the higher Court or Forum . Further , there is no force in the contention that decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia v CIT (supra) does not show that the date of agreement itself constitute the transfer. Again there is no force even in the contention that in that case it was ultimately ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ecial power of attorney was to be executed in favour of the Developer to enable to deal with the Statutory authorities etc . for obtaining necessary approvals/sanctions; letter of intent was to be obtained not later than March 8, 2006 and in case of a failure to do so, the agreement shall stand terminated. Letter of intent is basically a license granted by the Director of Town Planting to Developer of land for the purpose of constructing residential flats subject to payment of certain charges and compliance of other conditions. It was further stated in the agreement that on fulfilment of the requirement in the letter of intent, owners will have to execute irrevocable general power of attorney in favour of the Developer authorizing the Developer to took and sell the dwelling units out of developer's share and collect the money for the same. However, finally sale deeds could be executed only after the owner received their share of constructed area. Three months later, a supplementary agreement was entered on September 15, 2005 between the assessee and other co-owners and Developers through which it was agreed that owner s will s ell their 16% share in the built up area to the Develop....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p; Commentary (10th Edition- Revised by Shri S. Rajaratnam) brings out the correct legal position : "Section 45 enacts that the capital gains shall by fiction 'be deemed to be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place'. Since this is a statutory fiction, the actual year in which the sale price was received, whether it was one year, two years, three years, four years etc. previous to the previous year of transfer, is beside the point. The entirety of the sum or sums received in any earlier year or years would be regarded as the capital gains arising in the previous year of transfer. ....In the words of section 45, the capital gains arising from the transfer 'shall be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place'. So, the payments of consideration stipulated to be paid in future would have to be attributed, by statutory mandate, to the year of transfer, even as payments made prior to the year of transfer." 41. Thereafter , the Authority referred to section 2(47) and objects of the introduction of clauses (....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Hughes in their book on Jurisprudence that "if a topic ever suffered too much theorizing it is that of 'possession'". Much of the difficulty is caused by the fact that possession is not a pure legal concept, as pointed out by Salmond. The learned judge then explained the connotation of the expression "possession" by referring to the well known treatises on jurisprudence (page 278) : "'Possession', implies a right and a fact : the right to enjoy annexed to the right to property and the fact of the real intention. It involves power of control and intent to control, (see Dias and Hughes) 14. ................ 15. While recognizing that 'possession' is not a purely legal concept but also a matter of fact, Salmond (12th Ed., 52) describes possession, in fact, as a relationship between a person and a thing. According to the learned author, the test for determining 'whether a person is in possession of anything is whether he is in general control of it'." In Salmond's Jurisprudence, at paragraph 54, we find an illuminating discussion on "immediate" and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....general control and custody of the land can very well be reconciled. Clause (v) of section 2(47) will have its full play even in such a situation. There is no warrant to postpone the operation of clause (v) and the resultant accrual of capital gain to a point of time when the concurrent possession will become exclusive possession of developer/transferee after he pays full consideration. Further, if "possession" referred to in clause (v) is to be understood as exclusive possession of the transferee/developer, then, the very purpose of the amendment expanding the definition of transfer for the purpose of capital gains may be defeated. The reason is this: the owner of the property can very well contend, as is being contended in the present case, that the developer will have such exclusive possession in his own right only after the entire amount is paid to the owner to the last pie. There is then a possibility of staggering the last instalment of a small amount to a distant date, may be, when the entire building complex gets ready. Even if some amount, say 10 per cent., remains to be paid and the developer/transferee fails to pay, leadi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....plication or even written submissions filed earlier need not be probed into especially when it is not his case that the developer was not allowed to take possession in terms of the agreement." 42. After the above discussion, the Authority discussed the facts of the case before it. It was observed that paragraph 18 of the Collaboration Agreement provides that on issuance of letter of intent, the owners will allow and permit the Developer to enter upon and survey the land, erect site/sales office, carry out the site development work and do activities for advancing & sale promotion, construction etc. The Authority further observed that if this clause is read in isolation this would suggest on passing of possession but according to Authority the other factors are to be considered. Clause 15 provided that on fulfilment of the requirements laid down in the letter of intent which is provisional license, the owners should execute an irrevocable general power of attorney in favour of the developer allowing inter alia to book and sell the dwelling unit failing under their share. This was possible only after deposit of requisite charges etc. and perhaps there was lit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... land, that agency is coupled with interest. For these reasons, the prefix "irrevocable" is deliberately chosen. As discussed earlier, the owner's limited right to enter the land and oversee the development work is not incompatible with the developer's right of control over the land which he derives from the GPA. Exclusive possession, as already pointed out, is not necessary for the purpose of satisfying the ingredients of clause (v) of section 2(47). We are therefore, of the view that the irrevocable GPA executed by the owners in favour of the developer must be regarded as a transaction in the eye of law which allows possession to be taken in part performance of the contract for transfer of the property in question........" 43. Thus, the above clearly shows that irrevocable general power of attorney which leads to over all control of the property in the hands of the Developer, even if that means no exclusive possession by the Developer would constitute transfer. It can be said that it has to be construed as 'possession' in terms of clause (v) of section 2(47) of the Act. 44. A question may arise that why the transfer was not held....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n 2(47)(v) must be deemed to have taken place on the date of execution of such GPA. The irrevocable GPA was executed on May 8, 2006, i.e., during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2007-08 and the capital gains must be held to have arisen during that year. Incidentally, it may be mentioned that during the said year, i.e., financial year 2006-07, a final license was granted and the applicant/owners received nearly 2/3rds of the consideration. " 45. Legal position has been discussed in above noted paras and now let us discuss the facts of the case in the light of above noted legal position. 46 Undisputed facts of the case are that the assessee is a Member of Punjabi Co-op House Building Society Ltd. which had 96 members (Number of members were stated as 95 during arguments but clause 13 of the JDA refers to number of members as 96). The Society was owning 21.2 acres of land in village Kansal Distt. Mohali adjacent to Chandigarh. There were two types of members firstly the members who were owning plot of 500 sqyd and secondly the members who are holding plot of 1000 sqyd. Somewhere in 2006 it was decided to develop a G....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... payments. Copy of the resolution of the Executive Committee of the Society dated 4-1-2007 as well as resolution of the General Body Meeting of the Society dated 25-2-2007 were made part of JDA by way of annexure. The Society agreed to execute an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney in favour of THDC and all other necessary documents, at the request of the developers. 47. In clause 1 of JDA various expressions have been defined. Clause 2 describes the project as under: "2.1 The owner hereby irrevocably and unequivocally grants and assigns in perpetuity all its rights to develop, construct, mortgage, lease, license, sell and transfer the property along with any and all the construction, premises, hereditaments, easements, trees thereon in favour of THDC for the purpose of development, construction, mortgage, sale, transfer, lease, license and or exploitation for full utilization of the Property (Rights) and to execute all the documents necessary to carry out, facilitate and enforce the Rights in the Property including to execute Lease Agreement, License Agreements, Construction Contracts, Supplier Contracts....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....truction. Clause 4 deals with consideration clauses 5 to 8 deals various aspects of project and obligations of Society and Developer. Clause 9 talks about ownership and rights and read as under: "9 Transfer of ownership/Rights 9.1 The owner shall simultaneously on receipt of Payment as set out in Clause 4.1 above, execute an irrevocable Special Power of Attorney to THDC for development of the property authorizing THDC to do all lawful acts, deeds, matters and things pertaining to the development of the property for the project along with interalia right to mortgage the property and/or premises, sell, lease, license the premises and receive/collect monies in it's name in respect of the same and approach interact, communicate with the Competent authorities and for doing all acts, deeds, matters and things to be done or incurred by THDC in that behalf as also to sign all letters, applications, agreements and register the same if necessary, documents, Court proceedings, affidavits and such other papers containing true facts and correct particulars as made from time to time be required in this behalf. 9.2 The owner shall ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at pages 40 to 52 of the paper book in case of Society in ITA No. 556 of 2012 as discussed earlier in para 25 (complete copy of Supplementary Power of Attorney was not available in the paper book of the assessee, therefore, reference was made to the paper book in case of the Society) . 52. The first major contention of the Ld. counsel of the assessee is that the possession was not given by the Society because according to him as per clause 2.1 of the JDA the possession of the property was to be handed over simultaneously to the execution and registration of JDA and since the JDA was not registered, therefore, the possession was not given. We can not accept this contention because in "Power of Attorney" transactions , it is not necessary to register the JDA if a Special Power of Attorney has been given and same is registered. Secondly clause 9.3 of the JDA as reproduced above clearly show that original title deed which have been mentioned along with the possession in para 2.1 which according to the ld. counsel of the assessee were to be handed over simultaneously to execution and registration of the JDA, is not correct because clause 9.3 clearly mention tha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and properties for making provision of parking spaces thereon, and/or may utilize the same for any other lawful purpose, as THDC and/or their associate and/or group concerns may in their sold, absolute and unfettered discretion think fit. (w) To hand over the possession of the Property or any part or portion thereof to the authorities to whom the same is required to be handed over or otherwise and to execute and deliver any undertakings , declarations, affidavits, bonds, deeds , documents, etc. as may be required by the authorities concerned for vesting such a part or portion in such authority and to admit execution thereof before the concerned Competent Authority and get the same registered with the concerned sub-registrar. (y) Reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be given to mortgage, encumber or create a charge on the Property or any part or portion thereof and execute the necessary security documents in favour of any bank /financial institution to raise funds for the construction/development of the Property and for the said purpose to deposit title deeds ( if required) in respect of the Property in favour of such bank /fin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... i.e. THDC/HASH so that same can be used in furtherance of development of the Project as well as security for the money paid by the owner. Through clause 6.24 it was agreed that developer THDC/HASH was always permitted by owner to amalgamate the property with any other contiguous, adjacent and adjoining land and the properties wherein developmental and or other rights, benefits and interest were acquired by the developer or would be acquired in future. This clearly shows that the Society was under obligation in terms of agreement itself to allow the developer to amalgamate the project. Towards the end of clause 6.24 it has been clearly stated that in the event of termination of JDA, provision of clause 6 would be surviving which clearly shows that developer continues to be in possession for the purpose of development, mortgage etc. even after termination. Clause 8 which describes the obligation and undertaking of the THDC/HASH and provides specifically that all environmental clearance shall be obtained by THDC/HASH out of its own sources. Thus it was clearly understood by the parties that requisite environmental clearances had to be obtained before start of the project. Clause 10 a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... further clarified by clause (bb) and (cc) which gives the power of execution of conveyance and other documents involving in respect of the premises to be constructed without any interference of the Society being made confirming party. All these clauses clearly show that the possession was given by the Society and/or its members to THDC/HASH on the execution of irrevocable Power of Attorney. Through these clauses of JDA and irrevocable Power of Attorney the developer was able to completely control the property and make use of it not only for the purpose of development but also for the purpose of amalgamation, sale, mortgage etc. When the above clauses are compared on touch stone of the discussion on possession in paras 26 to 28 in the case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) which we have reproduced above, it becomes clear that the possession has been given. 56. In that discussion, it has been clearly mentioned that the position contemplated by clause (v) of section 2(47) of the Act need not to be exclusive possession. What is required is that the transferee by virtue of possession should be able to exercise control from overall intended purposes. We do not t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....584) 3 Co. Rep 7a. This Rule was upheld by the Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v State of Bihar [1955] 2 SCR 603 for consideration of Article 286 of the Constitution. It has been held in case of Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray v. Mr. Justice B. Lentin and another, 176 ITR 1 that for understanding amendment in the Act, perhaps Heydon's Rule is best rule for interpretation of such amendment. We find that without mentioning this rule Ld. Authority For Advance Ruling has discussed this issue in para 27 of the judgment which we have extracted above. It has been held that if 'possession' refer red to in clause (v) is to be understood as exclusive basis of the transferee then very purpose of the amendment or enlargement of the definition of transfer would get defeated. We are reproducing following head note of the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Dr. Baliram Waman Hiray v. Mr. Justice B. Lentin and another (supra) : "The following principles enunciated in Heydon"s case (1584) 3 Co. Rep 7a and firmly established, are still in full force and effect: "that for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in generals (be they pen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....land. First sale deed has been executed on 2.3.2007 for 3.08 acres and recitation clause ( A) reads as under: Clause (A) - The vendor is the absolute owner and in possession of land total measuring 169 kanal 7 marlas equivalent to approx. 21.2 acres in Village Kansal, Tehsil Mohali and more particularly described in Schedule A hereunder written and delineated in green colour boundary line in the Shizra Plan issued by the Patwari dated 23.2.2007." 60. According to the Ld. counsel of the assessee if Society had already given the possession then the Society would not have/had possession on 2.3.2007 of the land. At face value this argument looks attractive but when examined in terms of possession which has been explained in case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra), actual reality will come forward. In this judgment concept of concurrent possession has also been discussed and following extract of paragraph 55 of Salmond's Jurisprudence has been extracted which reads as under: "It was a maxim of the civil law that two persons could not be in possession of the same thing at the same time. As a general proposition t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....le rights in property including right to sell, right to amalgam ate the project with another project in the adjoining area which m ay be acquired later, right to mortgage etc. clearly show that rights given by the Society are much more larger than what is covered in the term "license". 64. Fourth contention is that the money received at the time of execution of JDA can be termed as advance and whatever money has been received has already been shown as capital gain. We find no force in this submission because Section 45 which has been extracted above clearly provide for taxing of profits and gains arising from the transfer. We have already discussed the implication of Section 45 r.w.s. 48 while discussing the legal position. We had also discussed this issue in the light of the decision in case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) and pointed out that when Section 45 is read along with Section 48 it becomes clear that whole of the consideration which is received or accrued is to be taxed once capital asset is transferred in a particular year. 65. We would like to discuss this aspect of the issue in little more detail and try to understa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r, two years, three years, four years etc. previous to the previous year of transfer, is beside the point. The entirety of the sum or sums received in any earlier year or years would be regarded as the capital gains arising in the previous year of transfer. . . . . In the words of section 45, the capital gains arising from the transfer 'shall be the income of the previous year in which the transfer took place'. So, the payments of consideration stipulated to be paid in future would have to be attributed, by statutory mandate, to the year of transfer, even as payments made prior to the year of transfer." 66. The above clearly shows that it is because of expression used in Section 45 that is "arising" which cannot be equated with "receipt". In this respect the ld. authority has quoted a very old decision of Hon'ble Madras High Court in case of T.V. Sundaram Iyengaar and Sons Ltd. v. CIT, 37 ITR 26 (Mad). At para 13 of the said decision is extracted in the following manner: "13. In T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd. v. CIT [1959] 37 ITR 26, a Division Bench of the Madras High Court w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....two definitions show that it (i.e. accrual) is not equal to the receipt of income. In fact it is a stage before the point of time when the income becomes receivable. In other words, once the vested rights come to a person then it can be said that such right or income has accrued to such person. The concept of accrual or arousal of income has also been discussed by the ld. author S. Rajaratnam in the commentary of Law of Income-tax by Sampath Iyengar XIth Edition by discussing the meaning of "accrued and arise" at page 1300 it has been observe as under: "(1) Important principles.- (a) Meaning - 'Accrue' means 'to arise or spring as a natural growth or result', to come by way of increase'. 'Arising' means 'coming into existence or notice or presenting itself'. 'Accrue' connotes growth or accumulation with a tangible shape so as to be receivable. In a secondary sense, the two words together mean 'to become a present and enforceable right' and 'to become a present right of demand'. In the Act, the two words are used synonymously with each other to denote the same idea or ideas very similar, and the difference lies only in this that one is more appropriate than....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ror or any person claiming under him shall be debarred from enforcing against the transferee and persons claiming under him any right in respect of the property of which the transferee has taken or continued in possession, other than a right expressly provided by the terms of the contract" 70. A plain reading of the above provision shows that it provides a safety measure or a shield in the hands of the transferee to protect the possession of any property which has been given by the transferor as lawful possession under a particular agreement of sale. This position of law was incorporated in the definition of 'transfer' by insertion of clauses (v) & (vi) in section 2(47) of the Act. It is important to note that clause (v) uses the expression "contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of T .P. Act, therefore, clearly the idea is that an agreement which provides some defense in the hands of transferee was incorporated under the definition of 'transfer' in the Income-tax Act. Now originally section 53A of T.P. Act provided that even if "the contract though required to be registered has not been registered", which means the right of defending the posses....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns so incorporated become part and parcel of the later Act as if they had been "bodily transposed into it". The effect of incorporation is admirably stated by LORD ESHER, M.R. : "If a subsequent Act brings into itself by reference some of the clauses of a former Act, the legal effect of that, as has often been held, is to write those Sections into the new Act as if they had been actually written in it with the pen, or printed in it.(p.233) Even though only particular Sections of an earlier Act are incorporated into later, in construing the incorporated Sections it may be at times necessary and permissible to refer to other parts of the earlier statute which are not incorporated. As was stated by LORD BLACKBURN: "When a single Section of an Act of Parliament is introduced into another Act, I think it must be read in the sense it bore in the original Act from which it was taken, and that consequently it is perfectly legitimate to refer to all the rest of that Act in order to ascertain what the Sections meant, though those other Sections are not incorporated in the new Act. ( p.244) 72. On the basis of above observation, it was held ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs of such lease were not permissible. People were transferring such properties by executing agreement to sell and general power of attorney as well as Will and receiving full consideration, but since the agreement to sell was not registered and though full consideration was received and even possession was given, still the same transactions could not be subjected to tax because the same could not covered by the definition of "transfer". To bring such transactions within the tax net, this amendment was made. It has to be appreciated that clause (v) in section 2(47) does not lift the definition of part performance from section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Rather, it defines any transaction involving allowing of possession of any immovable property to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. This means such transfer is hot required to be exactly similar to the one defined u/s.53A of the Transfer of Property Act, otherwise Legislature would have simply stated that transfer would include transactions defined in sec. 53A of the Transfer of Property Act. But the Legislature in its wisdom....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., in the context section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, having regard to the ground realities and further having regard to the object of the Income-tax Act, namely, to tax the income, "owner" is a person who is entitled to receive income from the property in his own right. The requirement of registration of the sale deed in the context of section 22 is not warranted." Thus, from the above, it is clear that it is not necessary to get the instrument of transfer registered for the purpose of Income-tax Act when a person has got a valid legally conveyed after complying with the requirements of the law. 9. Similarly, in the case of Mysore Minerals Ltd. v. CIT 1 99 9] 239 ITR 77 / 106 Taxman 166 (SC) , the assessee had purchased for the use of its staff seven low income group houses from a Housing Board. The payment had been made and in turn possession of the houses was taken over by the assessee. The actual conveyance deed was not executed. The assessee claimed depreciation which was denied by the department. After great discussion, it was observed that for all practicable purposes and for the purpose of Income-tax Act, the assessee s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Court in case of Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia (supra) is not applicable particularly because ultimately in that case it was held that capital gain tax should be charged in Assessment year 1999-2000 whereas agreement was executed in August, 1994. 76. We have already discussed the implications of the decision in case of Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia (supra) in paras 33 to 38. We had also examined why in that case capital gain was not held to be chargeable in Assessment year 1995-96.There is no need to repeat the same and in view of the said observations, we reject this contention. 77. The next contention is that it is necessary for invoking of section 2( 47)( v) of the Act to comply with the provisions of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act to the extent that there should be willingness on the part of the transferee to perform his part of the contract. 78. In this aspect we have no quarrel with the proposition that for invoking section 53A of T .P. Act read with clause (v) of section 2 ( 4 7) , the transferee has to perform or is willing to perform his part of t he contract. In this respect as refer....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 81. Now coming to the facts, firstly it was contended that Developer i.e transferee has not obtained various permissions which were required to be taken by the Developer as per clauses 3.1, 7.9, 8.4 and 8.6 of the JDA. This is not correct as pointed out by the Ld. CIT DR that assessee had already got the municipal plan sanctioned but in the meantime PIL was filed before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court against the implementation of the project. Initially, the construction was banned by the Hon'ble High Court. However, later on it was observed in the CWP No. 20425 of 2010 and as clarified by the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that refusal of sanction under the Environment (Protection) Act, the society have sought a review of the order because the findings arrived were ex.parte. No order in the matter has been passed by the competent authority perhaps because of the order of High Court. In the interim order passed in the PIL it has been clarified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 31.1.2012 permitting the concerned authority under the different statutes governing the matter to their respective jurisdiction to be decided in accordance wi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r circumstance with three (3) days of determining that an Event of Force Majeure has occurred. In the event any Party anticipates the happening of an Event of Force Majeure, such Party shall promptly notify the other party. (iv) The Party claiming Event of Force Majeure conditions shall, in all instances and to the extent it is capable of doing so , use its best efforts to remove or remedy the cause thereof and minimize the economic damage arising thereof. (v) Either Party may terminate this Agreement after giving the other Party a prior notice of fifteen (15) days in writing of the Event of Force Majeure continues for period of ninety (90) days. In the event of termination of this Agreement all obligations of the Parties until such date shall be fulfilled. 82. The combined reading of these clauses show that if any of the party could not perform its part of the obligation because of the unforeseen circumstances which included Government directions, Court orders , injunctions etc . such party would not be liable to other party. In view of Force Majeure claus....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iew that the issue with regard to clearance/sanction under the two enactments i.e. Environment (Protection) Act and Wild Life (Protection) Act is presently pending and as the promoters of the project have submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the authorities under the said enactments we should refrain from addressing ourselves on any of the issues connected with either of the two statutory enactments as any such exercise, even though may be unintended, may have the effect of fettering the jurisdiction of statutory a uthorities functioning under the two relevant statutes . 22. Insofar as the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act and the Wild Life (Protection) Act are concerned, it need not be emphasised that every project attracting the provisions of the Periphery Control Act and/or the provisions of the 1995 Act must satisfy the ecological concerns of the area in the light of the provisions of the two statues in question. As already held by us, a public trust has been bestowed on the authorities by provisions of the said Acts which cast on such authorities a duty to interdict any project or activity which even remotely seems to create an imb....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... cannot be said that Developer was not willing to perform his part of contract. In any case no specific evidence has been shown us to prove that THDC/HASH were declining to perform particular obligation provided in JD A. In view of this discussion, it cannot be said that transferee i.e. Developer THDC/HASH is not willing to perform his part of contract. 84 Secondly, it was contended that payments have not been made as per the JDA. However, again this is not correct. As per clause 4(iv) of the JDA, the instalment for Rs. 31,92,75,000/- was required to be paid. The clause 4(iv) read as under:- "(iv) Payment being Rs. 31,92,75,000/- (Rupees One Crore ninety two lacs seventy five thousand only) calculated @ Rs. 24,75,000/- (Rs. Twenty Four lacs seventy five thousand only) per plot holder of 500 Sq. yards and (Rs. 49,50,000/- (Rs . Forty nine lacs fifty thousand only) as per plot holder of 1000 square yards to be made to the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) within six (6) months from the date of execution of this agreement or within two (2) months from the date of approval of the plans/Design and Dr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....w of clause 4.1( iv) read with clause 26(v) of the JDA, HASH Builder were not required to make the payment and it cannot be said that they were not willing to perform their part of the contract on this aspect. Therefore, this contention is rejected. 87. Seventh contention is that revenue wrongly held that even clause (vi) of Section 2(47) is applicable. We find no force in this contention. Clause (vi) to Section 2(47) reads as under: "any transaction (whether by way of becoming a member of, or accruing shares in, a co-operative society, company or other association of persons or by way of any agreement or any arrangement or in any other manner whatsoever) which has the effect of transferring, or enabling the enjoyment of, any immovable property". 88. The plain reading of the provision shows that any transaction by way of becoming a Member or acquiring shares in the Co-operative Society or shares in the company which has the effect of transferring or enabling the enjoyment of any immoveable property would be covered by the definition of transfer. In the case before us, initially the Members of the Society ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... benefits. However, if the section is interpreted in the manner suggested by the ld. counsel of the assessee then no person would pay capital gain tax on transfer of a property. This will be clear from a simple example. Let us assume if "A" sells the property to "B" for a consideration of Rs. 100 crores and receive only a consideration of 1.00 crore and it is mentioned in the transfer instrument that balance of consideration would be paid after 20 years then no tax can be levied on such balance consideration of Rs. 99.00 crores which has not been received as per the contention of the ld. counsel of the assessee. But in that case no taxes can be levied even after 20 years because no transfer can be said to have taken place after 20 years and Revenue cannot do any thing because capital gain can be charged u/s 45 only on transfer of capital asset. We do not think that this kind of interpretation can be made while interpreting Section 45 r.w.s. 48 by invoking the rule that there can not be any tax on notional receipt. Generally speaking it is only the real income which can be taxed but this has to be understood subject to limitations. Commenting on these limitations, the Ld. Author Shr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....annual value has to be determined even if the property is not let out. This position has been discussed by the Ld. author Chaturvedi & Pithisaria's in Commentary of Income-tax Law (fifth edition) Volume 1 in this respect at pages 1275 & 1276 observed as under: "Annual value- determination of - Section 23(1)(a) provides that for the purposes of section 22, the annual value of any property shall be deemed to be the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to let from year to year. The word used is 'might' and not 'can' or 'is'. It is thus a notional income to be gathered from what a hypothetical tenant would pay which is to be objectively ascertained on a reasonable basis irrespective of the fact whether the property is let out or not [Sultan Bros. Pr. Ltd. v. CIT, [1964] 51 ITR 353 (SC); Jamnadas Prabhudas v. CIT, [1951]20 ITR 160(Bom); D.M. Vakil v. CIT, [1946] 14 ITR 298, 302(Bom); CIT v. Biman Behari Shaw, Shebait,[1968] 68 ITR 815 (Cal); Sri Sri Radha Govinda Jew v. CIT, [1972] 84 ITR 150, 156 (Cal); CIT v. Ganga Properties Ltd.,[1970] 77 ITR 637, 647 (Cal); Liquidator, Mahmudabad Properties Ltd. v. CIT, [1972] 83 ITR 470 (Cal), affirmed,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 60 lakhs then the profit would be presumed to be 8% of turnover even if he has suffered a loss. Another example of Section 2(22)(e) can be taken. Under this provision a loan or advance given by certain companies to a substantial share holder is to be treated as deemed dividend. Such loan under the normal accounting principle or on commercial principles cannot be regarded as income but because of this specific provision regarding deemed dividend such amount has to be treated as income of the person receiving such loans. 95. The above position of law makes it absolutely clear that theory of real income is subject to the provisions of the Act and whenever any specific provisions of the Act is there for charging of a particular item of income, then the same has to be charged accordingly. It may be sometimes hard to the assessee's but again it has been held in numerous decisions that Fiscal statues have to be interpreted on the basis of language used and there is no scope for equity or intent. Ld. Author Shri S. Rajaratnam in the Commentary of Law of Income-tax by Sampat Iyengar's Volume 1, page 236 in this regard has observed as under:-3 &n....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../- (Rupees One Hundred Six Crores Forty Two Lacs Fifty Thousands Only) calculated @ Rs. 82,50,000/- (Rupees Eighty Two Lacs Fifty Thousands Only) payable to 65 members having plot of 500 sq. yards each, Rs. 1,65,00,000/-(Rupees One Crore Sixty Five Lacs Only) payable to 30 members having plot of 1000 sq. yards each and Rs. 3,30,00,000/- (Rupees Three Crores Thirty Lacs Only) payable to the Owner for the 4 plots of 500 sq. yards each, which shall tantamount to the full and final payment to the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) in a manner set out herein below ('Payment'). Further, the transfer, sale and conveyance of 21.2 acres of land of the Property shall be made by the Owner in favour of THDC pro rata to the Payment received by the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) from HASH by executing sale deeds and registering the same. It is expressly provided that as resolved by the Owner, the total amount payable by HASH to the Owner and/or the respective members of the Owner (as the case may be) for assignment of the Development Rights and for transfer and sale of 21.2 acres of land of the Property shall be Rs. 106,42....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... to such Members to receive such flats. Once this vested right arises out of the above contract it can easily be said that this right has also accrued to the assessee. Clause 4.2 makes it absolutely clear that developer i.e. THDC/HASH was to allot the letters of allotment within 45 days from final sanction from the competent authority and such flats were part of entire consideration. Merely because such allotment letter has not been given because of sanctions/permissions could not be obtained because of Public Interest Litigation before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, it cannot be said that such right has not accrued. Though it may be hard on the assessee but it is well settled that taxation and equity are strangers. Further commenting on this aspect Shri Rajarathnam in his commentary has observed at page 5164 as under: "It is hard on the owners when required to pay tax, when handing over the possession for purposes of construction without being able to enjoy the construction, which is yet to commerce or in the process of construction being put up by the developer, but the solution lies in statutory clarification in such cases. In view of the incr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d at Rs. 1.00 crore and the Tribunal held that the consideration of Rs. 1.00 crore has to be accepted. 102. From the above decision it is not clear whether in case of Kalaptaru Construction Oversees Pvt Ltd. (supra) which has been followed in above case, was concerning capital gain or not? Secondly it is not clear that whether the amended consideration i.e. settlement for Rs. 1.00 crore was made in the same year or not? As observed earlier while discussing the issue of notional income that provisions of section 45 r.w.s. 48, are absolutely clear and there is no ambiguity that once a capital asset is transferred then whole of the consideration received or accruing has to be considered for the purpose of taxation in the year in which the transfer has taken place. We further find that in the JDA there is a clause for termination of the agreement. Relevant clause 14 reads as under: "Termination "14(i) Save and except the provision of clause 26, THDC shall at all times have the right to terminate this Agreement in the event there is any material breach of the representations, warranties, undertakings, declarat....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e by the appropriate statutory authority, then THDC may at its sale discretion terminate this Agreement. In the event the Agreement is terminated by THDC, all the lands registered in the name of THDC as per the terms of this Agreement upto the date of the termination shall remain with THDC and the balance lands to be transferred to THDC as per the terms of this Agreement shall not be transferred by the Owner in favour of THDC. Upon the termination, the Owner shall refund to THDC the Adjustable Advance/Earnest Money mentioned in clause 4.1(i) above within one month of such termination. In the event of failure of the Owner to refund the said amount, the Owner hereby agrees to execute a registered sale deed for land of equivalent value in favour of THDC. (iv) The owner shall have the right to terminate the Agreement only in the event of default by the Developers for making the Payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and the allotment of Flats within the time period as mentioned in this Agreement after giving Thirty (30) days written notice for rectification of such breach or any further time as may be desired by the Owner. In the event the Agre....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the same for any reason whatsoever out of its own will and discretion without obtaining a specific prior written consent of THDC or any of its duly constituted attorneys." 104. The above clearly shows that this Power of Attorney could not be revoked for any reason without obtaining specific prior written consent of THDC/HASH. No document showing the consent of THDC for revocation of this irrevocable Power of Attorney has been produced before us. We fail to understand that in the absence of such document how the assessee can claim that this Power of Attorney has been revoked. As discussed earlier while considering the legal position, we would again recall the words of Hon'ble Authority for Advance Ruling in case of Jasbir Singh Sarkaria (supra) wherein at para 33 of the decision while discussing the issue in respect of Power of Attorney, it was highlighted that execution of irrevocable Power of Attorney is of significant nature and the words " irrevocable" are very important. The expression "irrevocable" itself shows that normally such attorney cannot be revoked. Therefore, no cognizance can be taken in respect of revocation of the irrevocable Power of Att....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s observed at para 39 as under: "We have to advert to one aspect which has caused some concern to us. What will happen if during the year following the one in which the deemed transfer took place, the proposed venture collapses for reasons such as refusal of permissions, the developer facing financial crunch etc. By that time, the owner would have received only a part of the agreed consideration, but he is obliged to file the return showing the entire capital gain based on the full sale price whether or not received during the year of deemed transfer. In such an eventuality, hardship may be caused to the owner who would have paid full tax. No doubt, such a situation could be avoided if the contention of the applicant is accepted. On deep consideration, however, we find that the construction of the relevant provision should not be controlled by giving undue importance to such hypothetical situations. Normally, the owner executes a Power of Attorney or does similar act to left the transferee take possession only after the basic permissions are granted and he is satisfied about the ability of transferee/developer to fulfil the contract. In spite of that, if s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ms cannot do anything. Therefore, in view of the provisions of Section 45 r.w.s. 48 we are of the opinion that subsequent events, if at all any will not make any difference because total consideration received or accrued has to be assessed in the year of transfer. We may also note that it was stated that irrevocable Power of Attorney has been revoked but the word "irrevocable" itself shows that in the eyes of law special Power of Attorney could not have been revoked. In view of this analysis, we are of the opinion that either the JDA has not been cancelled or in any case the same cannot be considered for determining the taxation of capital gain. Accordingly this contention is rejected. 108. The next contention of the assessee is that even if the whole consideration has to be taxed then value of the flats cannot be taken at Rs . 4,500/- per sq. feet. It is also pointed out that in view of the agreement between the HASH & THDC consideration has been shown at Rs. 2,000/- per sq. feet for 126 flats whereas it is Rs . 4,500/- per sq. feet for three flats. We find no force in these submissions. The assessee has filed along with the written submissions copy of th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns to be incurred by THDC which was debited to the account of HASH. Further, HASH has agreed to purchase three Flats @ 4,500/- per square feet. Some news reports were quoted before us in one of the cases to show that various brokers had issued various advertisements for sale of these flats and these flats were ultimately to be sold at Rs. 7,000/- to Rs. 10,000/- per square feet. This also becomes clear from the addendum of agreement in terms of total proceeds of 1272 crores. In any case if the cost of construction is Rs. 2,000/-, then cost of land which has been paid to the society is also to be added to the cost of the flat because this portion of consideration in any case was received or to be received later by the society in cash. Considering the present market value of the flats in and around Chandigarh area which is Rs. 4,000/- to 12,000/- per square feet we are of the opinion that value of the flat at R s. 4,500/- per s quare feet is absolutely fair. In any case M/s HASH has agreed to purchase the flats at this rate from M/s THDC. It may be noted as pointed out by the ld. DR for the revenue some of the News report clippings filed by various assessees clearly shows that flats ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in flat. For the sake of convenience, provisions of section 54 F of the Act are reproduced below: "54F. Capital gain on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in case of investment in residential house. (1) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (4), where, in the case of an appellant being an individual or a Hindu undivided family, the capital gain arises from the transfer of any long-term capital asset, not being a residential house (hereafter in this section referred to as the original asset), and the appellant has, within a period of one year before or two years after the date on which the transfer took place purchased, or has within a period of three years after that date constructed, a residential house (hereafter in this section referred to as the new asset), the capital gain shall be dealt with in accordance with the following provisions of this section, that is to say,- (a) if the cost of the asset is not less than the net consideration in respect of the original asset, the whole of such capital gain shall not be charged under sectio....