Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (8) TMI 729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the amount of penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority on the appellant under the provisions of Section 112(b) and Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of the records, we find that the issue involved in this case is regarding the illegal diversion of muriate of potash (MOP). The appellant herein is distributor of Indian Pota....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lties imposed by the adjudicating authority on the appellant under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 may not be applicable as the appellant has not been shown as having imported the goods. 5. As regards the penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, we are of the view that the appellant has not made out the case and all the defences taken by him need to be gone into detail which....