Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (7) TMI 790

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....find that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of different kinds of aerated water. They were using furnace oil as fuel in their captive power plant for generation of steam. Such steam was being used by them in the manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted final products. 2. In terms of Rule 6(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, the appellants were not maintaining any separate accounts as the R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ere the subject matter of various decisions of Hon'ble High Court as also by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal. Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana vs. Nestle India [2010 (250) ELT 341 (P&H)] held that there is no requirement of reversal of credit availed on the fuel which stand used in the manufacture of dutiable as well as exempted final p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed advocate appearing for the appellant fairly agrees that the issue on merits stands finally settled against the appellant by the said decision of the Honble Supreme Court. However, he submits that during the relevant period, there were decisions in favour of the assessee and as such, no malafide can be attributed to the appellant, in which case, extended period of limitation would not be applic....