2013 (7) TMI 84

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue's Appeal: ITA No.351/Hyd/2013 : Assessment year 2006-07 2. Effective grounds of the Revenue in this appeal are as follows- "1. CIT(A) allowed relief to the assessee on the basis of information filed by the assessee. The CIT(A) ought to have given the opportunity to verify the additional evidence and submit remand Report as per rule 46A. 2. The order is passed on the directions of the CIT IV, vide order u/s. 263 of IT Act, with regard to the amount of loan. Learned CIT(A) has no jurisdiction to overside the directions of CIT IV u/s. 263. 3. All the additions are made after giving opportunity to the assessee. Non-compliance to the show cause notices, the additions are made and order passed u/s. 144 of IT Act. Under the circumstance....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 5,37,748 5. On appeal, the CIT(A) deleted the additions of Rs.9,71,452 on account of disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) and of Rs.5,37,748 on account of excess claim of expenditure, in their entirety, and gave partial relief out of the addition of Rs.1,83,97,530 made on account of interest not offered to tax. Aggrieved by the reliefs granted by the CIT(A), Revenue is in appeal before us, with the grounds already extracted above. 6. We heard both sides and perused the orders of the lower authorities, and other material on record. It has been brought to our notice that the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax IV, Hyderabad dated 23.3.2011 passed under S.263 of the Act, which gave rise to the present proceedings in which the additions in d....