Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (6) TMI 441

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ded by the Superintendent, Central Excise, Range-IV, Division-II, Silvassa visited the premises of Shri Khatu Shyam Industries on 16.6.09 and conducted searches in the presence of two independent panchas, Shri Sanjay Jha, Authorised Signatory and Shri Manish Ramavtar Agarwal, Parnter. Therefore, the officers in the presence of panchas and Shri Sushil Pandey, authorised signatory, physically verified the stock of inputs i.e. M.S. Ingots, finished goods i.e. TMT bars and waste and scrap in the factory of the appellant unit and found (1) 29.265 MT of inputs i.e. M.S. Ingots, (2) 69.593 MT of finished goods i.e. TMT bars (3) 14.605 MT of waste and scrap excess to the recorded balance. The total value of said goods was Rs.28,29,601/- involving c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enalty of Rs.2,00,000/-. The goods valued at Rs.28,29,601/- lying in the factory premises unaccounted seized and provisionally released have been confiscated with an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs.3,00,000/-. The Assistant Commissioner has also imposed penalties of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.50,000/- on Shri Manish Ramavtar Agarwal, partner of M/s. Shri Khatu Shyam Industries and Shri Sanjay Jha, authorised signatory of M/s. Shri Khatu Shyam Industries respectively. 4. Aggrieved by such an order, the appellant firm and the individuals preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority did not agree with the contentions raised by the appellants and held that the order in original....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....posed on the authorised signatory, it is his submission that such penalty imposed is also incorrect as there is no role attributed to the individual for imposition of penalty. 6. Ld. Additional Commissioner, (A.R.) would submit that the orders of the lower authorities are correct as there is a clear cut admission on the part of the partner as to purchasing of ingots from open market and clandestine manufacturing and clearance of the finished goods as well as scrap. He also submits that there was an excess stock of finished goods lying in the factory premises which has not been properly accounted for and hence liable for confiscation. 7. I have considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. 8. The issue involved in....