Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (5) TMI 609

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Rs.35,26,400/- as claimed by the appellant for A.Y. 2005-06. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case the Commissioner of Income-tax has erred in concluding that the current year depreciation and brought forward depreciation cannot be adjusted against capital gains for assessment year 2005-06. the appellant submits that as per the provisions of Income tax Act, 1961 the appellant is entitled to set off current year depreciation and brought forward depreciation against the capital gains of A.Y. 2005-06. The conclusion reached by the Learned Commissioner of Income tax is erroneous and is contrary to the provisions of Income tax Act, 1961." 3. Briefly stated, assessee filed its return of income declaring total income at Rs.1,55,72,469/-. The return was subjected to scrutiny under section 143(3) by the DCIT-8(2), Mumbai and vide order dated 20.12.2007 the total income was computed to an extent of Rs.3,10,47,410/-. The AO, inter alia, called for details and made adjustments to the claim of set off of unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years. This order was subjected to proceedings under section 263 by the CIT-8, Mumbai on the following reasons: - (a) that assessee paid brokera....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ogistics Pvt. Ltd. has actually paid any taxes on the alleged brokerage received by it. Probably, M/s. Ovira Logistics is a loss incurring company and transfer of profits from a subsidiary company by the holding company is basically for the purpose of reducing the tax liability as otherwise there is no business justification. Thus, the claim of brokerage made by the assessee is neither genuine because the assessee has failed to produce evidence of experience and expertise in the business of brokerage by M/s. Ovira Logistics Pvt. Ltd. and the payment is highly excessive keeping in view of the provisions of section 40A(2)(b) of the I.T. Act. Since the AO has failed to make enquiry by examining the facts property, the assessment made by her by accepting the claim of brokerage is erroneous and the same is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Accordingly, the assessment made by the Assessing Officer is modified to the extent that the brokerage expenses of Rs.35,26,400/- are liable to be disallowed and the Assessing Officer shall re-compute the income by disallowing the brokerage expenses. 5. The Counsel for the assessee has not filed any written explanation as to why the claim o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ore the CIT in the course of proceedings under section 263. With reference to genuineness of the claim it was submitted that the assessee was negotiating for sale of property and the said holding company is in the business of consultation and brokerage and referred to the incomes earned by the said company, placed in the paper book. It was further submitted, referring to the papers placed before the authorities and also in the paper book, that originally the M/s. Ovira Logistics Pvt. Ltd. demanded 3% commission on the sale value which was reduced to 2% after obtaining quotations from Satguru Estate and also Laxmi Housing Agency. These quotations were at 2.75% and 2.5% of the sale amount. It was further submitted that the CIT again invoked provisions of section 40A(2)(b) when the incomes were offered under section 50 as capital gains. With reference to the second issue of claim of depreciation, he referred to the details placed before the authorities about year-wise carried forward depreciation and submitted that consequent to the amendment brought to the Act by Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 01.04.2002, current year. 6. depreciation can be set off to the other incomes under sections 70 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on Inter Corporate Deposits 6,720,731 7 Closing Balance outstanding     a) Debtors (4,638,995)   b) Creditors 6,112,101 In addition, in the audit report under section 44AB in Annexure -3 to Form 3CD the details are placed as under: - Sr. No. PARTICULARS Amount No. (Rs.) A Payment made M/s Ovira Logistics Private Limited (Holing Company)Account Head   1 Deputation Exps for Salary Reimbursement 4,391,220 2 Others (Petrol Expenses, labour charges, discount on spars, discount on labour etc.) 258,569 3 Brokerage (Net of Service Tax Rs.3,26,400) 3,200,000 4 Claim for Disputed quality of services rendered 5,000,000   Subtotal 12,849,789   Reimbursement of Director's Salary to Orix Auto & Business Solutions Ltd.   1 Deputation Exps for Salary Reimbursement 1,218,407   Subtotal 1,218,407   TOTAL 14,068,196 In addition, in the depreciation schedule also the net amount was taken after reducing the brokerage amount. The assessee also submitted a note regarding computation of income. These do indicate that the assessee has produced all the details before the AO eventhough no specific enquiry seems to have....