2013 (4) TMI 459

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Renu Jagdev, AR, for the Respondent. [Order (Oral)]. -  As per facts on record, the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses falling under Chapter 78 of Central Excise Tariff Act. They are availing services of goods transport agency for receiving the inputs in the factory as also for clearing the final product from the factory. The appellant, as recipient of GTA ser....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ms of newly introduced provisions of Rule 6(4B)(iii) with effect from April, 2007 adjustment to the extent of only Rs. 50,000/- was permissible. Accordingly, he allowed the adjustment to the extent of Rs. 50,000/- for the said period and confirmed the demand of balance amount of Rs. 43,344/- and Rs. 59,266/- along with interest and imposition of penalties. The said order of original adjudicating a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(4B)(iii). 5. I have gone through the said Rule, which lays down that in a case other than specified under clause (ii), the excess amount paid by adjustment with monetary limit of Rs. 50,000/- for a relevant month or quarter, however, I find that Rule 6(3), under which relief stand granted to the appellant for the previous period, continues to remain on statute. The benefit of said provisi....