2013 (4) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed by the appellant against order in appeal No.720/2012/COMMR(A)/RBT/RAJ, dt.07.08.12 under which Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the order in original dated 9.2.12 passed by the original adjudicating authority for a demand of Rs.5,30,710/- confirmed by the adjudicating authority along with imposition of penalty under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The issue involved in this....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase that the issue of admissibility of input service credit is a settled issue now. Appellant has relied upon a number of judgments out of which the judgment in the case of CCE Vadodara Vs. Danke products (supra) is the most relevant. Paragraph 7 of this judgment is reproduced below: 7. Apart from the above, he has also taken note of the definition of the input service as appearing under Rule 2....