Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (4) TMI 105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....toms, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following questions of law u/s 35-G of the Central Excise Act for the opinion of this Court: - "1. Whether introduction of Section 11D would invalidate w.e.f. 20.9.91 the enforcement of Notification Nos. 130/83-CE and 132/83-CE though continued upto 30.9.94. or it would mean to continue the incentive scheme in spite of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he sale of sugar to the newly installed sugar factories as well as the factories who have expanded their manufacture by installing new machineries. The respondent company is engaged in the manufacture of sugar by vacuum pan process and was a new industry, accordingly, it was claiming exemption under the aforesaid Government Order dated 27.8.1983 of the basic excise duty and additional excise duty.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Order dated 27.4.1983 has not been effected. Since the respondent was entitled for exemption under the Government Order dated 27.4.1983, as such, the excess amount collected by the respondent cannot be recovered. After hearing the parties, the adjudicatory authority by order dated 31.3.1994 held that since the respondent has actually collected the full amount of the excise duty from the customers....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mills Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad; 2005 (182) E.L.T. 26 (SC), in which the Supreme Court has held that under the incentive scheme, exemption of excise duty at the concessional rate has been granted to the assessee, but the Government Order does not permit the assessee to collect more than what they have to pay to the Government under the scheme. If the assessee has collected e....