2013 (4) TMI 73
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....MR.SUDHEESH KUMAR. JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged Ext.P2 series assessment orders in respect of the assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 passed by the first respondent, by approaching the second respondent/appellate authority preferring Exts.P3 to P5 appeals . The petitioner is stated as constrained to approach this Court by virtue of the coercive proceedings taken in th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration. This crucial aspect was never considered by the second respondent, when the interim order was passed as per Ext.P8, casually imposing a condition upon the petitioner, which hence is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition. 3. The learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that, this not at all a fit case whe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... order of penalty was set aside and the matter was remanded. It reads as follows: "But the learned Advocate appearing for the appellant convinced that the issued copies are not legible and not compared with the orignal seized records. As discussed above it is evident that the Intelligence Officer had not returned the seized records to the appellant as prescribed in the provisions of law and denie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r for fresh disposal according to law after affording reasonable opportunity to the appellant. The Intelligence Officer shall issue legible certified copies of the entire seized records to the appellant according to law, within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order. The Intelligence Officer is directed to complete the fresh order after verification of the entire books of accounts and con....