2013 (4) TMI 61

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....irected against the order of learned CIT(A), Meerut dated 18th June, 2010 for the AY 2005-06. 2. Ground No.1 raised by the Revenue reads as under:- "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs.4,17,805/- and Rs.10,00,000/- on account of unverifiable loan from Shri Satish Chopra and Smt.Chand Rani respectively in spite of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... sufficient funds and sources of income. The transaction is through bank. Her creditworthiness genuineness and identity is not challenged." 4. With regard to Shri Satish Chopra, following explanation was given:- "The deposit is old one. Previously accepted by deptt. He is resident of Canada and mama of assessee. His passport and confirmation is filed. His creditworthiness, genuineness and id....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order of learned CIT(A) on this point and accordingly, ground No.1 of the Revenue's appeal is rejected. 6. Ground No.2 raised by the Revenue reads as under:- "Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the CIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs.2 lacs made by the AO on account of cash deposit in the bank account of the assessee from undisclosed sources? The amount ha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... As the assessee has given ample evidence regarding this entry, the addition made in deleted." 8. From a perusal of the above finding, it is evident that in the remand proceedings, the assessee produced the evidences explaining the source of the deposit of Rs.2 lakhs in cash in the bank account which has not been disputed by the Assessing Officer. In view of the above, we do not find any infir....