2013 (3) TMI 547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n this appeal of the department, the short question to be considered is whether the respondent was entitled to take CENVAT credit of Rs. 6,840/- on the inputs supplied by M/s. Planet India Remedies Pvt. Ltd. during the period from July to September 2008. According to the appellant, the input was not excisable as it resulted from a process (cutting and slitting of jumbo aluminium foils) which did n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Superintendent (AR) for the appellant, I have found no successful rebuttal against the respondent's submissions. He has reiterated the grounds of this appeal and has referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in S.R. Tissues case. 3. After considering the submissions, I find that the respondent satisfied the essential requirements for CENVAT credit. Notwithstanding excisability of the input, the ....