2013 (3) TMI 373
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....JUDGEMENT:- 1. In this appeal by the revenue for the assessment year 1999-2000, following questions of law have been raised for our consideration :- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in cancelling the penalty levied of Rs.26,25,000/- u/s.271(1)(c) in the light of decision of Supreme Court in the case of Goetzd India ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessment proceedings, the assessee was asked to give details of interest on tax free bonds. While preparing the said details, it was noticed that 6% Government of India Capital Index Bonds purchased during the year had inadvertently been categorized as tax free bonds and, therefore, interest of Rs.75,00,000/- earned on such bonds had also inadvertently escaped tax. The assessing officer levied ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erest received of 6% on the Government of India Capital Index Bonds as interest received on tax free bonds. It is not contended by the Revenue that above finding of fact by the Tribunal is perverse. In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question (i). 3. So far as question (ii) is concerned, the respondent assessee had claimed premium on redemption of debentures as i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at the respondent-assessee had concealed any particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income by stating incorrect facts. The assessing officer considered the said premium received on redemption of debentures to be taxable under the head income from other sources while the respondent-assessee considered the same to be taxable under the head capital gains. In view of the fact tha....
TaxTMI