Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (3) TMI 351

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the process) and other know-how developed by Central Electrochemical Research Institute (CECRI), which is a unit of National Research and Development Corporation of India (NRDC). It is the case of the petitioner that CECRI is a specified laboratory and, therefore, the certificate ought to have been issued for the assessment years 1979-80 to 1983-84. A writ of mandamus is sought in this regard. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.3 to admit and take on record the said certificates for assessment years 1979-80 to 1983-84 and to grant investment allowance at the higher rate of 35% as claimed by the petitioner as against the rate of 25% already granted by the income tax department to the petitioner. 3. The facts are that the petitioner manufactures inter alia caustic soda at its plant at Nagda, Madhya Pradesh. Most of the caustic soda produced by the petitioner is captively used for production of viscose staple fibre/Rayon. Earlier, the petitioner was using graphite anodes in its process of electrolysis for production of caustic soda. However, the use of graphite plates as anodes had several disadvantages which had been poi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ough and uneven surface for electrolysis and due to this the gap between the graphite anode and flowing film of mercury cathode could not be reduced in practice to less than 5 to 6 mm. In case the gap was reduced beyond this level, there was every possibility of the anodes touching the cell bottom containing the flowing film of mercury at certain places, thereby resulting in a short circuit which would damage the anodes, disturb the mercury flow and stop the electrolysis. Metal anodes having smooth surface have a great advantage over graphite anodes in this respect. With proper anode adjustment devices it has been possible to continuously maintain a gap of 2 to 3 mm between the two electrodes, without risking a short circuit. Reduced electrode gap (sometimes called as brine gap) results in lower voltage and a lower power consumption. With the Titanium Substrate Insoluble Anodes (TSIA) the other disadvantages of graphite anodes stated herein-above are also eliminated. Loss of graphite is eliminated. Chlorine gas remains free of Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. Apart from a reduced brine gap, the bubble effect is negligible. This results in a reduction in cell voltage which entail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... process of manufacturing Caustic Soda and Engineers of Titanium Equipment and Anode Manufacturing Co. Ltd., which has been licensed to use the technology and know-how for manufacturing Titanium Substrate Insoluble Anodes visited our factory and provided us the necessary technique and guidance for designing and installing the electrolyser suitable for the new technology and process and assisted us in commissioning the same. They also advised us regarding adoption of suitable process conditions. They still continue to advise and guide us whenever we approach them." 7. However, the said applications of the petitioner were rejected. The first rejection came by virtue of the impugned order dated 10.10.1979 which is to the following effect: -    "I am directed to refer to your letter No.GRCN/79/2795 dated 10th July, 1979 and discussions which Dr. R. Vaidyanathan, your representative had in this Department on 20th Aug., 1979 regarding the issue of certificate u/s 32-A(2B) of the Income-tax Act and to say that your application has been carefully examined in this Department. The clarification sent by you vide your letter No.GR/ND/79 dated the 31st Aug., 1979 have also been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has contended that the technology that was developed by CECRI was for the manufacture of TSIA. That technology has already been utilised by TEAM for manufacture of TSIA. Furthermore, while TEAM would be entitled for a certificate under section 32A(2B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the utilisation of the technology to manufacture of TSIA, the petitioner would not be entitled to the issuance of a certificate as it only uses the TSIA for the manufacture of caustic soda. It was also pointed out by Mr Jatan Singh that such a certificate had been issued to TEAM and they have availed of it. However, Mr Ganesh, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, contended that this approach is erroneous because of improper understanding of the technology which was developed by CECRI. CECRI had developed not only the technology to manufacture the TSIA but also the know-how or the process for use of TSIA in the manufacture of caustic soda through electrolysis. He submitted that the technology was a composite technology both for the manufacture of TSIA and for the utilisation of TSIA in the process of manufacture of caustic soda. Furthermore, he pointed out that the license w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Nos.1, 2 and 5 to the said paragraph 17 of the writ petition is as under: -    "I say that C.E.C.R.I. had developed the technology for metal anodes (TSIA). The petitioner manufactures caustic soda and not the TSIA.    The payment of royalty by the petitioner is by virtue of the agreement, NRDC has made with the TEAM for the manufacture of anodes." On going through the above extract, we agree with the submission made by Mr Ganesh, that the submissions of the petitioner have not been specifically denied. In other words, it will have to be accepted that what TEAM provided to the petitioner was a composite facility. One part being the supply of TSIA and the other part being the licence to use the technology whereby the TSIA was to be employed for the manufacture of caustic soda. Mr Ganesh, had also drawn our attention to a communication issued by CECRI, which was circulated by the Alkali Manufacturers' Association of India on 27.01.1978. The said communication reads as under: -    "Sub-Titanium substrate insoluble anodes    (TSIA) in chlor-alkali cells.    Sir,    You may already be aware that this Instit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed authority,    the provisions of sub-section (1) shall have effect in relation to such machinery or plant as if for the words "twenty-five per cent", the words "thirty-five per cent" had been substituted, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:-        (i) the right to use such technology (including any process) or other know-how or to manufacture or produce such article or thing has been acquired from the owner of such laboratory or any person deriving title from such owner;        (ii) the assessee furnishes, along with his return of income for the assessment year for which the deduction is claimed, a certificate from the prescribed authority to the effect that such article or thing is manufactured or produced by using such technology (including any process) or other know-how developed in such laboratory or is an article or thing invented in such laboratory; and        (iii) the machinery or plant is not used for the purpose of business of manufacture or production of any article or thing specified in the list in the Eleventh Schedule.    Expla....