2013 (3) TMI 156

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of service for the GTA service availed by them. They were engaged in export of Iron Ore. The appellant had filed a refund claim of Rs.6,85,973/- which was returned by the adjudicating authority for want of supporting documents and to intimate relevant provisions of Central Excise Rules under which refund was claimed. Thereafter, they filed a rebate claim dated 28.07.2008 for an amount of Rs. 5,98....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on several occasions. On 24.08.2010 and 29.12.2010 nobody was present on behalf of the appellant and on 21.06.2011 the matter was adjourned to facilitate the learned advocate for the appellant to produce documents to show that the rebate claim and refund claim relate to the same shipment and jurisdiction issue also was raised. However, on 28th September again the learned counsel for the appellant ....