Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (2) TMI 453

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt and learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue. The facts leading to the controversy are the following. During the previous year relevant for the assessment year 2006-07, the assessee sold land for above Rs. 11 crores and deposited most of the sale proceeds in term deposits in the banks. Even though the assessee contested his liability for tax on the capital gains, the Assessing Officer computed tax on capital gains and raised a total demand of Rs. 2,17,73,630. As a result of the assessment and notice of demand issued, the tax fell due in January, 2009. The assessee's first appeal against the assessment before the Assessing Officer was unsuccessful. During pendency of the second appeal, the Department initiated garnishee proce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tted that contrary to the findings of the Commissioner, the assessee has satisfied all the three conditions as provided under section 220(2A) inasmuch as he had made payments voluntarily and in terms of the conditional stay orders and within six months from the due date for payment the entire tax was paid. Since the assessee has made full payments voluntarily without  the Department taking any serious steps for recovery, we feel the asses- see's case requires close examination. Conditions for waiver as contained in  section 220(2A) are as follows : "(2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (2), the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner may reduce or waive the amount of interest paid or payable by an assessee under th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t on deposit is taxable at the hands of the appellant-assessee and the bank itself would have deducted tax at source from the interest and paid to the Department. If the assessee had on due dates withdrawn the term deposits and remitted the entire tax amount, the assessee would not have earned interest on which tax is levied and recovered by the Department. This is a matter which certainly calls for consideration by the Chief Commissioner because, in our view, the assessee is entitled to waiver of interest at least to the extent of tax paid on interest. Besides the above, we are also unable to uphold the findings of the Chief Commissioner that the stay obtained against the recovery proceedings initiated under section 226(3) of the Act sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... we feel all the three conditions were to some extent satisfied, and the refusal of the Chief Commissioner to grant reduction in interest is not justified. What is clear from section 220(2A) is that the Commissioner or the Chief Commissioner need not always waive amount of interest in full but can grant waiver or reduction partially. What is indicated by the provision is that relief to be granted under section 220(2A) should be proportionate to the extent of satisfaction of the conditions stated therein. In other words, if the conditions are partially satisfied the assessee should be given partial relief, i.e., partial waiver which should be in proportion to the extent of satisfaction of the conditions. In our view, section 220(2A) is an in....